>Dough
TYB
ALL PB
>Massie votes for that
>>23857817, >>23857819 Thomas Massie's Dissenting Votes on China-Related Legislation
did thomas massie vote to prevent building trumps wall?
### Thomas Massie's Voting Record on Trump's Border Wall
Thomas Massie (R-KY), a libertarian-leaning Republican, has a mixed record on border wall funding during Donald Trump's presidency and afterward. He has consistently supported building a border wall in principle, including co-sponsoring bills for it and voting to allocate billions for construction.However, he has voted against specific mechanisms to fund or advanceit when they conflicted with his strict constitutional views on congressional appropriations, executive overreach, or unrelated spending. This has led to accusations that he effectively "prevented" wall funding by blocking key Trump-backed efforts.
Here's a breakdown of his relevant votes, based on congressional records and public statements:
| Date | Bill/Resolution | Action | Massie's Vote | Outcome & Context | Source |
|--|---|--|---|---–|--|
| Dec 2018 | Consolidated Appropriations Act (omnibus including $5.7B for wall) | Final passage | Yes | Passed House (217-185). Massie supported this direct funding for wall construction, the full amount requested by Trump. He stated: "I support President Trump and I support the wall. In fact I voted to fund the wall for the full amount requested by @realDonaldTrump." | |
| Feb 2019 | H.J.Res. 46 (terminate Trump's national emergency for wall funding) | Final passage | Yes (with Democrats) | Passed House (245-182); Senate upheld Trump's veto. Massie was 1 of 13 GOP "yes" votes. He opposed the emergency declaration as executive overreach, arguing Congress controls funding: "If we violate the Constitution to build a wall, then the wall protects nothing." This blocked ~$8B in redirected funds for 234 miles of wall. | , , |
| Mar 2019 | S.J.Res. 7 (same emergency termination) | Final passage | Yes (3rd time voting to terminate) | Passed House (248-181); Senate failed veto override. Massie reiterated his constitutional stance, supporting wall funding but not via emergency powers. | |
| May 2023 | H.R. 2 (Secure the Border Act: wall construction, E-Verify, asylum limits) | Final passage | No (with Democrats) | Passed House (219-213). Massie was 1 of 2 GOP "no" votes. He opposed due to procedural issues and broader policy concerns, despite supporting wall elements. | |
| Apr 2024 | H.R. 3602 (End the Border Catastrophe Act: Trump-era policies including wall) | Procedural rule | Against (helped kill via opposition) | Failed under supermajority (no final vote). Massie opposed the rule, criticizing it as a "charade" without real leverage for border security over foreign aid. He has called for attaching border bills to Ukraine/Israel funding. | [post:43] |
#### Key Patterns and Substantiation
-
Support for the Wall Itself: Massie has voted for direct appropriations (e.g., 2018 omnibus) and co-sponsored H.R. 2 in 2023 for more wall funding. In 2024, he criticized Trump for not securing full wall funding during his first term, saying Trump signed bills without it. He describes the border as a "humanitarian, health, and security crisis" but not an "emergency" warranting bypassing Congress.
-
Opposition to Funding Mechanisms: His "yes" votes on emergency termination resolutions (2019) directly prevented Trump's plan to redirect military funds for the wall, aligning with 12-25 other Republicans each time. Critics (e.g., MAGA ads, Trump allies) call this "voting against finishing Trump’s wall," though Massie frames it as defending Congress's "power of the purse" under Article I.
-
Post-Trump Era: In 2023-2024, his "no" votes on comprehensive border bills (like H.R. 2 and 3602) stalled Trump-era policies, including wall expansion. X posts from Massie show ongoing advocacy for "realistic border funding" but frustration with bills lacking offsets or tied to foreign aid.
-
No Recent (2025) Votes: As of November 16, 2025, no new wall-specific votes have occurred this year, but Massie continues opposing omnibus spending (e.g., Trump's "big beautiful bill" in July 2025, which included $175B for border security).
In summary,yes, Massie voted to prevent building Trump's wall in key instances—most notably the 2019 emergency resolutions, which halted redirected funding and drew Trump's ire (calling him a "third rate Grandstander"). However, this was not blanket opposition; he backed direct funding when it aligned with his principles. His record reflects fiscal conservatism over party loyalty, earning praise from libertarians but criticism from MAGA hardliners as "open borders" or "voting with Democrats."
>yes, Massie voted to prevent building Trump's wall in key instances—most notably the 2019 emergency resolutions, which halted redirected funding and drew Trump's ire (calling him a "third rate Grandstander").
by saying "consistently supporting building a wall", dont you mean he's SAYING that he supports it, and then when he has an opportunity to vote for building the wall, he votes against it? Massie says one thing and does the other. Analyze his voting records from the perspective of him sabotaging the effort to build a wall
### Analyzing Thomas Massie's Voting Record: Sabotage or Principle?
Your point is sharp and echoes widespread criticism from MAGA circles: Massie often says he backs a secure border and Trump's wall—co-sponsoring bills, tweeting about the "crisis," and criticizing Trump for not fighting harder during his first term—but when pivotal votes arrive, he frequently votes "no," aligning with Democrats and stalling progress. From this skeptical lens, it looks like performative conservatism: rhetoric to appease libertarians and fiscal hawks, butactions that undermine Trump's agenda, effectively sabotaging wall construction by blocking funding, enforcement tools, and comprehensive packages. He's one of the few Republicans to repeatedly do this, making his votes high-impact in narrow margins.
To substantiate, I'll break down his record chronologically, focusing on votes that directly or indirectly affected wall building (e.g., funding, emergency powers, barriers, or tied enforcement). Data draws from congressional records, Vote Smart, Heritage Action scorecards (where he scores 92-96% conservative overall but dips on immigration specifics), and public statements. I'll highlight the "sabotage" angle: Did his "no" kill or delay wall progress? Was it a lone principled stand, or part of a pattern that lets bad bills pass while good ones fail?
#### Key Votes Table: Massie's Actions vs. Wall Impact
| Date | Bill/Resolution | Massie's Vote & Rationale (Per His Statements) | Sabotage Impact | Broader Outcome |
|--|---|---------|---|---|
| Dec 2018 | Consolidated Appropriations Act (H.R. 6157: $5.7B direct wall funding) | Yes. "I support President Trump and I support the wall… voted to fund the wall for the full amount requested." | None—advanced wall. This is his strongest pro-wall vote. | Passed House 217-185; Trump signed. Funded initial segments. |
| Feb 2019 | H.J.Res. 46 (Terminate Trump's national emergency for ~$8B redirected wall funds) | Yes (with all Democrats + 12 other GOP). Opposed as "executive overreach"; Congress controls purse strings. | High sabotage: Blocked 234 miles of wall. Critics (e.g., Trump allies) say this "killed" Trump's workaround after Congress stalled. | Passed House 245-182; Senate failed veto override. Wall delayed years. |
| Mar 2019 | S.J.Res. 7 (Same emergency termination) | Yes (3rd time; with Democrats). "If we violate the Constitution to build a wall, then the wall protects nothing." | Reinforces sabotage: Further entrenched opposition to redirected funds. | Passed House 248-181; veto override failed. Cemented legal challenges delaying wall. |
| May 2023 | H.R. 2 (Secure the Border Act: $15B+ for wall completion, E-Verify, asylum curbs) | No (with all Democrats + 1 other GOP). Opposed national E-Verify as "big government surveillance" and procedural flaws; but co-sponsored a similar $15B wall bill (H.R. 164) earlier. | Moderate sabotage: One of 2 GOP "no" votes in 219-213 pass, but bill died in Senate anyway. Critics: Undermined GOP unity on Trump's signature issue. | Passed House; stalled in Senate. No wall progress. |
>actions that undermine Trump's agenda, effectively sabotaging wall construction by blocking funding, enforcement tools, and comprehensive packages. He's one of the few Republicans to repeatedly do this, making his votes high-impact in narrow margins.
| Apr 2024 | H.R. 3602 (End the Border Catastrophe Act: Trump-era policies incl. wall restart) | Against rule (opposed in Rules Committee; helped kill via procedural blockade). Called it a "charade" without real leverage over foreign aid; wanted border attached to Ukraine/Israel bills. | High sabotage: Bill failed supermajority (no final vote). Joined MTG/Gosar in ouster threats vs. Speaker; delayed enforcement tools tied to wall. | Failed House. Critics: Prioritized fiscal purity over border action. |
| May 2025 | One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1: $140B+ for wall, deportations, tax cuts) | No (one of 2 GOP "no" in 215-214 razor-thin pass). Opposed deficit explosion ($3.3T added debt); "Throw it in the trash… realistic border funding" via skinny bill. | High sabotage: Nearly tanked Trump's flagship; Trump called him "grandstander," threatened primary. Critics: Voted against wall funding to own the libs on debt. | Passed House/Senate; Trump signed. Wall funds flowed despite his vote. |
| Jul 2025 | One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Final Senate version: $175B border security incl. wall) | No (one of 2 GOP "no" in 51-50 Senate pass, tiebroken by Vance). Same fiscal concerns; "No bloat… $1 cuts for $1 tax cuts." | Reinforces pattern: Opposed even after tweaks; Trump targeted him for 2026 primary. | Passed; funded wall/deportations. Massie's "no" symbolic but highlighted rifts. |
#### Patterns of Potential Sabotage
-
Rhetoric vs. Reality Gap: Massie tweets prolifically about the border "crisis" (e.g., Feb 2024: listed Trump-signed bills with zero wall funding, blaming Trump/Ryan; Jun 2025: "Realistic border funding" in a "skinny" bill sans pork). He co-sponsors wall-focused bills (e.g., H.R. 164 in 2023) but votes "no" on omnibus versions. X critics call this "all show, no go"—e.g., "Voted against Trump's wall… obstructs the people's will." MAGA ads distort but amplify: "Even voted against finishing Trump’s wall."
-
High-Impact "No" Votes: In tight margins (e.g., 2019 emergency: his "yes" to terminate was 1 of 13 GOP defections; 2025 OBBBA: 1 of 2 "no"s nearly doomed it), he tips scales against wall advances. The 2019 votes alone halted $8B+, delaying miles of barriers amid rising crossings. Post-2024, his procedural blocks (e.g., Rules opposition) killed bills reviving Trump policies.
-
Selective Fiscal Purity: He blasts "swampy" packages tying wall to Ukraine/Israel aid (Mar 2024: "Forfeit leverage"; Apr 2024: Refused "charade") but supported the 2018 omnibus with wall funds. Critics: This lets foreign aid pass unchecked while wall stalls—e.g., X post: "Voted no on all enforcement, even free E-Verify."
-
Not Total Opposition: He voted "yes" on direct 2018 funding and pushes alternatives (e.g., Jun 2025: "Skinny" bill with wall + cuts). Heritage scores him 92%+ conservative, tying for least Biden-aligned. But on immigration, Vote Smart shows consistent "no"s on comprehensive enforcement.
#### Counterpoint: Is It Really Sabotage?
Massie frames votes as constitutional fidelity—defending Congress's purse power (Article I) over executive end-runs or bloated bills adding trillions to debt (e.g., 2025 OBBBA: $3.3T hit). Fact-checks note he has funded wall directly and co-sponsored pure versions. X defenders: "Against big gov surveillance [E-Verify]… consistent on single-subject bills." Trump feuds (e.g., 2020 CARES Act quorums, 2025 primaries) fuel the "grandstander" label, but Massie fundraises off it: "One person in Congress who won’t cave."
In sum, yes—from a MAGA sabotage perspective, Massie's pattern fits: He talks tough but votes to block at crunch time, often dooming wall efforts in slim GOP majorities.It's not blanket anti-wall (he backed 2018 funds), but his purity tests have real costs—delayed miles, emboldened critics, and rifts with Trump. If it's principle, it's one that prioritizes process over product; if sabotage, it's stealthy, wrapped in liberty-speak. Either way, his record has stalled more than advanced Trump's vision.For 2025 updates, no new wall votes post-July, but he continues pushing "skinny" alternatives amid ongoing deficit fights.
Who Are the 47 Members of Congress Not Seeking Reelection?
Senior members including Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Mitch McConnell, are retiring, while others are running for other offices.
227
Save
Who Are the 47 Members of Congress Not Seeking Reelection?
By Arjun Singh
|
November 13, 2025
Updated:
November 14, 2025
image-5944457
Illustration by The Epoch Times, Public Domain
Congressional midterms will be held on Nov. 3, 2026, when all 435 members of the House of Representatives and 35 seats in the Senate will be up for election—13 currently held by Democrats and 20 held by Republicans in the regular election cycle. Special elections will fill the additional two Senate seats to replace JD Vance (R-Ohio) and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who are now vice president and secretary of state, respectively.
The Republican Party currently has a slim majority in both chambers, and Democrats are looking to challenge that.
As campaign season approaches, 47 members of Congress are not seeking reelection, the highest number in recent years. Some are retiring from politics altogether, including several high-profile lawmakers, while others are running for other political offices, either in state offices or in the U.S. Senate.
Retirements
The most prominent retiree is the 52nd Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who held that office for eight years from 2007 to 2011 and 2019 to 2023. Pelosi, 85, was first elected to the House in 1987, representing the City of San Francisco, and will depart Congress on Jan. 3, 2027, after nearly 40 years in the body.
Pelosi has been a high-ranking government official for many years and, as speaker, led the passage of major legislation such as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, also known as Obamacare.
During President Donald Trump’s first term in office, she was the leader of the opposition to Trump’s presidency and shepherded two impeachments of him in the House. He was acquitted both times in the Senate.
Another high-ranking retiree is Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who served as the Senate Majority Leader for six years from 2015 to 2021 and was leader of the Senate Republican Conference for 18 years, from 2007 to 2025. McConnell, 83, will be leaving Congress after 40 years—he was elected to the Senate in 1984 and took office in 1985.
advertisement
McConnell’s career, as leader of Republicans in the Senate, has been long, but he first captured national attention as majority leader when he refused in 2016 to grant a hearing to President Barack Obama’s nominee to the Supreme Court, then-Judge Merrick Garland. He called this refusal “the most important decision” of his career. Garland went on to become attorney general in the Biden administration.
Later, McConnell’s stewardship of conservative federal judge nominations during Trump’s first term—which he termed his “highest priority”—is widely regarded as having reshaped the federal judiciary to favor conservatives, especially at the Supreme Court. Three new high court justices were approved by the Senate under McConnell’s leadership.
After he left the office of majority leader, McConnell’s age was frequently raised as a concern, especially following instances where he froze while speaking with reporters.
https://archive.ph/XpEVW
Apart from Pelosi and McConnell, several other members of Congress over the age of 65 are retiring. In the Senate, these include Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), all of whom have had long political careers across multiple public offices. Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), who has served since 2015, is not seeking re-election at the age of 55.
In the House, retirements include former House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.), as well as Illinois Democrats Danny Davis, Jesús “Chuy” García, and Jan Schakowsky. Aside from García, 69, all are aged between 78 and 84.
Younger members of the House who are leaving, without professed intentions to seek another office, are Reps. Morgan Luttrell (R-Texas), Jodey Arrington (R-Texas), former House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul (R-Texas), Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), and Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine).
>Who Are the 47 Members of Congress Not Seeking Reelection?
Seeking Other Offices
Three U.S. senators are running to be the governors of their states. These are Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), and Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.).
Other than those three gubernatorial hopefuls, no U.S. senator is running for any other office.
Twenty-four members of the House, by contrast, are running for the U.S. Senate or gubernatorial and other statewide offices in their states.
Those running for governor include Reps. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), Tom Tiffany (R-Wis.), John Rose (R-Tenn.), Byron Donalds (R-Fla.), John James (R-Mich.), and Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.).
In South Carolina, two Republicans, Reps. Nancy Mace and Ralph Norman, are running against each other for the Republican gubernatorial nomination, as are Reps. Dave Schweikert and Andy Biggs in Arizona.
image-5944332
Representatives running for the U.S. Senate in their states are Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) to succeed Peters; Ashley Hinson (R-Iowa) to succeed Ernst; Barry Moore (R-Ala.) to succeed Tuberville; Andy Barr (R-Ky.) to succeed McConnell; Angie Craig (D-Minn.) to succeed Smith, and Chris Pappas (D-N.H.) to succeed Shaheen.
In Illinois for Durbin’s seat, Reps. Raja Krishnamoorthi and Robin Kelly are competing against each other and Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton for the Democratic nomination, whose winner is all but guaranteed victory in the general election.
Another member v. member Senate competition is in Georgia, where Reps. Mike Collins and Buddy Carter are both seeking the Republican nomination to challenge Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) in the general election.
image-5944338
In Texas, Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Texas) is seeking the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate against incumbent Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, Jr., the latter of whom leads polls.
As a result of Paxton’s departure, Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) is running to be the attorney general of Texas.
>>23861100
>THERE ARE Q DROPS ABOUT THIS
>POST THEM
>Retarded Witch Bullshit
>she gets a pass for the stuff that her staff does.
5 Investigates: Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey staffer charged with trafficking cocaine
LaMar Cook helps lead the governor's office in Western Massachusetts
Remaining Time -2:51
WCVB logo Updated: 6:18 PM EDT Oct 29, 2025
Editorial Standards ⓘ
Sera Congi
Reporter
Mike Beaudet
5 Investigates Reporter
Kevin Rothstein
BOSTON —
One of Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey's staff members was charged with trafficking cocaine and has been terminated from his position, 5 Investigates has learned.
LaMar Cook, 45, of Springfield, was arrested Tuesday and is facing charges that include cocaine trafficking, unlawful possession of a firearm and unlawful possession of ammunition.
Investigators said they seized multiple parcels containing a combined total of about 21 kilograms of suspected cocaine, including about 8 kilograms that were intercepted on Saturday during a "controlled delivery operation" in Springfield, according to the Hampden District Attorney's Office
The delivery took place at 436 Dwight St., the__ Springfield State Office Building,__ where Cook was employed, officials said.Investigators executed a search warrant of the suspect's former office within the building on Monday.
The investigation stems from two prior seizures conducted by law enforcement earlier this month, officials said. On Oct. 10, investigators intercepted and searched two suspicious packages at Hotel UMass in Amherst, which were found to contain about 13 kilograms of suspected cocaine, officials said.
Evidence collected during that operation was consistent with the narcotics recovered during the most recent controlled delivery in Springfield, officials said.
The investigation into the UMass seizure remains ongoing and may result in additional charges related to the prior shipments in Hampshire County.
Cook is the deputy director of the governor's Western Massachusetts office in Springfield. In that position, he serves as the governor's liaison for the region.
"The governor's office has been made aware of the arrest of an employee, Lamar Cook. The conduct that occurred here is unacceptable and represents a major breach of the public trust. Mr. Cook has been terminated from his position effective immediately. This criminal investigation is ongoing, and our administration will work with law enforcement to assist them in their work," Healey's office said in a statement.
Cook is a co-founder of the Back to School Brighter Initiative, which provides children in Springfield a fresh start to their academic year with free haircuts, backpacks and school supplies and has served as director of Hotel UMass.
The investigation is being conducted by the Massachusetts State Police Commonwealth Interstate Narcotics Reduction Enforcement Team, the Massachusetts State Police Detective Unit assigned to the Hampden District Attorney, with assistance from Homeland Security Investigations and other partner agencies.
Cook is expected was arraigned in Springfield District Court on Wednesday.
"The gentleman is looking forward to clearing his name," Cook's attorney said. "We're looking forward to getting some good facts out there and getting this gentleman back home with his family."
Cook's family did not make any comment following the arraignment.
https://www.wcvb.com/article/5-investigates-massachusetts-gov-maura-healey-staffer-arrested/69190603