gm frens
Clearing out the space?
jeff stinks
>who's a shill
PRESS F5!
It guessed the right one?
If its any consolation both reddit and 4chan are getting ultra-flooded with absolute poop too. Seems like the entire internet is collapsing.
True anon! Even the pinned comments on many big youtube videos is IQ90 slop (at best) most times.
I am going to assume they are humans. Judging from the language, terminology and phrasing patterns I wouldn't say that anyone there has a mental age over 15.
But compare that language to actual research articles if you don't believe me, the mass-retardation is real. It's like they are trying to "normalize" retard-lang as a way to compensate for the idiocy of their bots, as if they are trying to make the bots seem more realistic with a consensus of retardation.
OK serious post here and thinking stream coming ahead!
>Our government is the same as Burger King and Popeyes
From a logical point of view, I would like to address the fallacies present within your statement. Firstly, there is an issue with the analogy used in comparing the government to fast food chains. While it may be tempting to draw parallels between these entities due to their competitive nature, this comparison is flawed as they operate on fundamentally different principles and serve distinct purposes.
In addition, you seem to employ a false equivalence fallacy by equating the actions of two fast food companies with that of a government. This fallacy arises when one assumes that because two things share some similarities, they must be equivalent in all aspects. In this case, while both Burger King and Popeyes are competing for market share, their objectives and scope of influence do not align with those of a government.
>see: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_analogy
Furthermore, your statement contains an ad populum argumentum fallacy. This fallacy occurs when one assumes that because something is popular or widely accepted, it must be true or correct. In this case, you imply that the popularity of these fast food chains somehow supports the idea that their actions are comparable to those of a government.
>source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
And your statement seems to employ a non sequitur fallacy as well. This fallacy occurs when one assumes that because event A happens and is followed by event B, event A must have caused event B. In this case, you suggest that the supposed similarity between fast food chains and the government implies that "the movie never ends" or that there will be no resolution to their competition.
>see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur
Strikes 3/3 - and you're out!
Btw consider a similar meme:
>"Vaccines are just like competing sports teams. They're both engaged in a race to outperform each other, aiming to be the best option for their target audience. But if you look closer, you'll see that they're both funded by the same group of people behind the scenes. The game never ends. Two more weeks."
This statement also contains similar fallacies as your previous one. It employs a false analogy between vaccines and sports teams, assuming that because both are involved in competition, they must be equivalent. Additionally, it uses an ad populum argumentum fallacy by implying that the popularity of vaccines somehow supports this flawed comparison. Lastly, it includes a non sequitur fallacy by suggesting that because these entities share some similarities, their ongoing competition will never end or have no resolution.
Should I analyze any other logically false memes?
can has new bread