Anonymous ID: 141482 Dec. 5, 2025, 9:59 a.m. No.23944708   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4821 >>4917 >>4959

Long-Awaited Vaccine Reversal Finally Arrives

After 34 long years, medical freedom wins.

The Vigilant Fox

Dec 05, 2025

 

A long-awaited vaccine reversal has just sent shockwaves through the US medical establishment after 34 long years.

 

ACIP, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, just voted 8–3 to end the universal Hepatitis B birth-dose recommendation and move instead to shared decision-making for infants born to hepatitis-B–negative mothers.

 

For the first time since 1991, parents (not a blanket federal recommendation) will decide whether their newborn receives this shot in the first hours or days of life.

 

Voting YES to end the universal mandate: Retsef Levi and seven other members.

 

Voting NO: Dr. H. Cody Meissner, Dr. Joseph R. Hibbeln, and Dr. Raymond Pollak. Two of the three issued grave warnings, insisting the decision to end the universal hepatitis B recommendation will “cause harm” and that the panel will have to “accept this responsibility when this harm is caused.”

 

more:

 

https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/long-awaited-vaccine-reversal-finally

Anonymous ID: 141482 Dec. 5, 2025, 11:03 a.m. No.23944899   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Glyphosate “Safety” Study Ghostwritten by Monsanto Retracted After 25 Years of Deception

Millions of pounds of glyphosate were approved, defended, and sprayed worldwide on the basis of a paper we now know was fundamentally compromised and scientifically invalid.

Dec 05, 2025

 

In a long-overdue move, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology has formally retracted the landmark 2000 glyphosate “safety” review by Williams, Kroes, and Munro — a paper Monsanto and global regulators have relied on for decades to assert that Roundup poses no carcinogenic risk to humans.

 

Crucially, the Editor-in-Chief confirms that Monsanto employees likely secretly wrote substantial portions of the paper, despite never being listed as authors or acknowledged — a revelation uncovered through U.S. litigation.

 

The retraction states that the article’s integrity has collapsed entirely, citing undisclosed corporate authorship, omitted carcinogenicity data, financial conflicts of interest, and a complete failure by the surviving author to respond to the journal’s investigation.

 

more:

 

https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/glyphosate-safety-study-ghostwritten