Anonymous ID: 6c736b Aug. 1, 2018, 1:14 p.m. No.2395833   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2395254 lb

 

We really do not know that much about the new CEO, Suzanne Scott.

 

She did call producers and hosts to task and asked them to make sure that their shows do not get out of hand, and that they should protect the Fox brand. If nothing else, that means do not follow the crowd and would support a host that doesn't follow the 4am talking points.

 

What do we know about her?

Anonymous ID: 6c736b Aug. 1, 2018, 1:25 p.m. No.2396078   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6121

>>2395860

 

Sophie Touchet

A French-speaking Canadian model

The photo in the meme shows a watch prominently

Because it came from an ad campaign

For a watch company

 

There are lots of Canadians

That are part of the Q movement

(notice that it is now a movement)

So on behalf of Canada

Let me say

Vive la Liberté!

Anonymous ID: 6c736b Aug. 1, 2018, 1:29 p.m. No.2396180   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6192

>>2396121

 

Fact is, that even with meme text added

A clever anon can track these images

To their source

So Michael Avenatti's attempt

To add a black dot to his image

Would not prevent tracking it

Anonymous ID: 6c736b Aug. 1, 2018, 1:32 p.m. No.2396241   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6265

>>2396203

 

Not really

Photos include EXIF data

But postprocessing often removes that

You need to use other means

Like an archaeologist does

To track the source of images

And the date they were photographed

Anonymous ID: 6c736b Aug. 1, 2018, 1:35 p.m. No.2396311   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2396236

 

Have you read Alinsky's books?

Rules for Radicals?

Reveille for Radical?

 

I have, and I recommend it for anyone who is serious about playing the game of politics. The tactics in those books will be used against you. Are you ready to recognize them? And to counter them?

 

Not all of them are obvious to detect

Anonymous ID: 6c736b Aug. 1, 2018, 1:44 p.m. No.2396480   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2396265

 

No such easy thing as that.

Like I said, postprocessing can remove all of that

Because it creates a new image, and usually lower res too.

However the same techniques that were used

To identify which typewriter wrote a letter

Back in the 30's and 40's

Could be applied to photos

To identify the device that took the original picture

But that is very sophisticated

And likely nobody outside of NSA tries this

It is also error prone

It is like if you take a photograph of something

And an analyst extracts data from all the reflections

Including the raindrops falling

To create a composite image of YOU the photographer

So that we can get hair color, clothes being worn and phone model

Then we could troll through CCTV data

In the area

Until we see you walking somewhere

And finally, get your face

From a taxicab camera

When you get into it

And from that, we identify you.

 

Sometimes it can be done

But it is at the extreme limits of what is possible