anyone ever heard of Hanging Judges, only this time its the other way around….
yw and TY baker. I thought it was nice myself being the OP
I have been shopping at the wrong malls it seems.
Yes Sir, Its the only way to solve it imo and everyone else's as well. I will put one in my yard if needed. Wont think anything more about it. have few acres they can get planted on and I will never pay anymore land taxes.. A win win.
my tree 2025
Daniel Concannon
Daniel Concannon
@KeepNHGranite
·
5d
One of these two is a murderer. The other is dead. Can you guess which is which?
Of course you can.
Black 18-year-old Aundre Matthews stabbed White 16-year-old Andrew Meismer inside a Sterling High School classroom in Baytown, TX on Wednesday, killing him.
After witnessing the Black-on-White murder, students were told to go back to taking their exams.
National news coverage thus far? None.
Of course not. Nothing to see here.
move along
I do miss the Old Days
I spent some time in Romania,I saw THE Vlad Dracula, Dracul, systems of punishment and YES lets do this. Here and now Please
This will stop over night…..
they like islam…here
https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/fa/29/35/fa2935ad73ef2253a8a7f077ab07289e.mp4
HORROR: Homeless Man Fatally Stabs Elderly Woman in Barnes & Noble in South Florida thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/horror-man-fatal…
The Scumball forgot he was not in New York any more.
its time
tru dat
THIS
Differences between federal law, immigration status, and state programs in health coverage
The debate over health coverage for immigrants in the United States has become one of the most manipulated topics in political discourse. Limited humanitarian exceptions—established by law for decades—are often confused with ideological expansions promoted by some states that go far beyond the federal framework.
To understand the issue rigorously, it is essential to distinguish between what federal law allows, what it expressly prohibits, which benefits depend on immigration status, and which programs have been created unilaterally by state governments using their own funds.
The federal legal framework: clear limits and specific exceptions
Federal law does not allow immigrants who are in the country illegally to access full public health insurance. However, it includes very limited exceptions, in place for decades, based on humanitarian criteria.
Emergency Medicaid
Emergency Medicaid covers only situations of immediate life-threatening risk, such as:
Serious accidents.
Critical medical emergencies.
Childbirth and pregnancy-related complications.
This benefit:
Is not full Medicaid.
Does not cover routine medical care.
Does not include chronic treatments or preventive care.
It has existed since the 1980s and does not depend on the president in office.
Emergency hospital care (EMTALA)
Under federal law, hospitals that receive public funds are required to stabilize anyone in an emergency, regardless of immigration status.
This is not health insurance, but a minimum obligation to provide urgent care.
What is full Medicaid and who can benefit?
Full Medicaid is a joint federal–state comprehensive health insurance program designed to cover ongoing medical care, including:
Regular doctor visits.
Preventive care.
Hospitalization.
Prescription drugs.
Treatment of chronic illnesses.
Those who normally qualify include:
Low-income US citizens.
Children and pregnant women.
Seniors.
People with disabilities.
Qualified legal immigrants, after meeting strict requirements.
Federal law expressly prohibits immigrants who are unlawfully present or not fully regularized from accessing full Medicaid.
What federal law explicitly prohibits
Under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996 , immigrants without legal status cannot access:
Full Medicaid.
Medicare.
Obamacare (ACA) plans with federal subsidies.
Asylum seekers: what happens while the case is pending?
People who have applied for asylum but whose case has not yet been approved:
Do not have access to full Medicaid.
Cannot receive ACA subsidies.
Can only receive emergency medical care.
Applying for asylum does not equal full legal status and does not grant automatic benefits; However, if the asylum applicant has a work permit and meets specific rules, they may qualify to apply through the ACA marketplace and even receive government subsidies.
Approved asylum: federal benefits allowed by law
When asylum is approved, the person is considered a qualified legal immigrant .
Legal basis
Refugee Act of 1980.
PRWORA (1996).
Regulations of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Possible benefits
An approved asylum may:
Apply for full Medicaid if income requirements are met.
Access ACA plans with subsidies.
Receive temporary Refugee Medical Assistance.
Unlike other legal immigrants, asylees are not subject to the five-year waiting period for Medicaid.
International students
Students with F-1, J-1, or other visas:
Do not qualify for Medicaid.
Do not have access to federal public insurance.
Must purchase mandatory private insurance.
However, some recent interpretations of the law have opened the door for those who are legally in the US to benefit from ACA insurance depending on state rules, length of stay, and whether they are considered tax residents.
State programs that expand coverage beyond federal law
Despite the clarity of federal law, some states have created their own programs—funded with state money—that expand health coverage to immigrants without legal status.
California:
Full expansion of Medi-Cal to immigrants without legal status.
Coverage equivalent to full Medicaid.
Funded exclusively with state funds.
Illinois:
Sauce, and MOAR,
https://gatewayhispanic.com/2025/12/what-does-u-s-law-really-say-about/
KEK,
AI IS GETTING WAY BETTER
The Redheaded libertarian
@TRHLofficial
This is incredibly powerful