the device had many purposes.
it was an excellent way to tell 'time of day'
one could see it from many places.
They were used as a way to track the heavens.
you'r 'it's a pinus' description is incorrect.
it had an enlarged top and spurted watter, and if it had two large ovalure elements at the bottom, and if it were skewed at an angle attached to an even larger statue of a ruddy nake man . . . then it would be what you describe.
In Greek cities if they wanted to look at pinus statues there was a phallus cult that would sponser them and they were very common.
you probably would have liked it but my quess is you see that in anything that has a cylindrical shape.
"It's a penis. No, wait, it's a forearm.
It's a penis.
No, wait, it's a wrench.
It's a penis.
No, it's a roll of paper towels.
What about that?
um, I think that's a salt shaker!
No it isn't. It isn't a salt shaker. A salt shaker could look like a penis!
You're right about that but that one doesn't and, yes, I was wrong, it's not a salt shaker. It's a pepper grinder."
lighten up morning anon. I know you probably wake up with a partial chub, and wish you had someone to rub, but . . . you really should be nicer to the other anon.
years ago I remember hearing how some parents would demand that their children were 'special needs' and demand to be able to send the child to a very high priced out of state school.
Massachusetts had overly generous budget money for such indulgences.
I found it odd, and this was over thirty years ago, that a child who was basically unable to care for itself, and would never ever be able to do such, because it had 'issues' (and it was obvious that it had issues) would get like 10 or 100 times the resources for school.
it occured to me that it was unfair.
and why was it unfair? because other children were put into school systems with stingie budgets where all the money was spent on Athelites and band and speach programs.
It occured to me is one child needed 100,000 a year to have school, then every child should be allocated 100,000 a year for their education: equal dollars seemed like equality to me.
but not to the Down Syndrome/ Autism groups that profiteered off of that. To them spending 20 times the money of the Down Syndrome kids was what they demanded.
and it occured to me that a lot of those parents may have, in fact, invested in those schools and profiteered off of their sending their own children to them at public expense.
and then when the whole 'he needs speed' children were a thing, it seemed to me, again, that there must be parents who profiteered off of this.
and the kids who would be called 'normal' in the old days were left shivering in the cold at a bus stop riding a crappy smelly bus to school, and given old books and crappy material, and go begging.
if there are children who can not take care of themselves, and will always be a burdan to the rest of us to take care of, it makes FAR more sense to sponser the ones who are bright and might pull in an income later in life, and foster their education so as to have folks, in the future, who will be making the money to pay the taxes that would be needed to pay for these unfortunate darling special children.
and as far as the unfortunate darlings: if they get 20 times the resources that, to me, is descriminating in their favor and shouldn't be.
you could also go after that other anon's image: false piety.
you could tell him that he's got no right to tell you how to post.
the holier than thou look of his avitar is rather off-pissing to me. I mean off-putting.
apply your own logic to the one who you pretend you have the right to direct their efforts here in these breads.
your false piety is annoying.
you know that you post a false narrative.
your constant false narrative is slander.
you will not get over continuing with this tract of reporting.
you will face the consequences of your constant shilling in this manner.
repent, and reform.
sacrifice your own false narrative for the good of your soul and apologize to all those whom you have slandered.