the precident of the Civil War is the reason no state can use.
you know this but you post your false narrative anyway.
the precident of the Civil War is the reason no state can use.
you know this but you post your false narrative anyway.
you just say stuff to get a reaction.
you have no legal or moral authority.
your pronouncements are just talking points and useless narrative
go to Gettysberg
your logic is flawlessly flawed.
if you and your marxist friends ever had full control you'd put the Constitution of the United States in the toilet.
Not only that when your crowd does have power they routinely ignore the rights of people and do as they will.
you're an enemy to all of humanity?
It wouldn't matter what I'd say, you'll always have some 'back at cha'.
You are not here to agree but to disagree.
ah, so you're this bot.
make sure you use words that are very broad and wide used.
are you going to do that classic 'why do you deny the truth' bit?
if you're here for capital T truth you seem, to me, to be fake because all you want is conflict and discord.
what do you disagree with me about?
I've just told you how wrong you are and how false.
you are capital 'F' False.
>>24112721
how do they deliver to the Pentagon?
does the Pentagon have a Pizza Gate?
because the liberals want everything to be very very hard for the police.
the requirement to read 'Miranda rights' is not in the constitution.
the constitution says nothing about an officer of the law having to ape out words that people ought to already know.
the requirement was IMPOSED by activist judges.
a non Scientologist who knows about Scientology is usually not 'for' it.
you mean 'the roll'
>Apocalypse of James
I asked the Google AI why these were not included in the canon:
"
To be considered for the canon, a text typically had to originate during the apostolic age (roughly 40โ110 AD). Scholars date the Apocalypses of James to the mid-2nd to 3rd century AD, long after the death of James the Just (c. 62 or 69 AD). Because they were written centuries after the events they describe, they could not have been authored by James himself.
"
"Mainstream early Christians viewed these works as pseudepigraphaโwritings falsely attributed to a famous figure (in this case, James) to gain authority. Their "fantastical" or "legendary" nature made them appear unreliable compared to the canonical accounts. "