dChan
Anonymous ID: d61c3c Jan. 12, 2026, 2:15 p.m. No.24112436   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2484 >>2731 >>2973 >>3057

Donald J. Trump / @realDonaldTrump 01/12/2026 17:13:29

 

Congestion Pricing in Manhattan is a DISASTER for New York. It’s got to be ended, IMMEDIATELY! It’s never worked before, and it will never work now. I love New York, and hate to see it being destroyed so rapidly with such obviously foolish “policy.” Thank you for your attention to this matter!

 

PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

 

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115884425860726582

Anonymous ID: d61c3c Jan. 12, 2026, 2:45 p.m. No.24112576   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2731 >>2973 >>3057

>>24112559

RICO for the Minnesotans

 

Under RICO, a person who has committed "at least two acts of racketeering activity" drawn from a list of 35 crimes (27 federal crimes and eight state crimes) within a 10-year period can be charged with racketeering if such acts are related in one of four specified ways to an enterprise.[2]

 

Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and sentenced to 20 years in prison per racketeering count.[3]

 

In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of racketeering activity.[4]

 

A US Attorney who indicts someone under RICO has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or an injunction to temporarily seize a defendant's assets and prevent the transfer of potentially forfeitable property as well as to require the defendant to put up a performance bond. An injunction or performance bond ensures that there is something to seize in the event of a guilty verdict.

 

This provision prevented the owners of Mafia-related shell corporations from absconding with assets. In many cases, the threat of a RICO indictment can force defendants to plead guilty to lesser charges, in part because the seizure of assets would make it difficult to pay a defense attorney.

 

Despite its harsh provisions, a RICO-related charge is considered easy to prove in court because it focuses on patterns of behavior as opposed to criminal acts.