Anonymous ID: 329d09 Jan. 12, 2026, 4:47 p.m. No.24113262   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3264 >>3323 >>3596 >>3634 >>3895 >>3929

DOT Strips California Of $160 Million Over Foreign Truckers

 

It’s “reckoning day” for California.

 

The Trump administration announced Wednesday it will withhold $160 million in funding to California after the Golden State missed a deadline to revoke 17,000 commercial driver’s licenses the feds say were improperly issued to illegal immigrants.

Anonymous ID: 329d09 Jan. 12, 2026, 4:54 p.m. No.24113297   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3596 >>3634 >>3895 >>3929

It appears Trump is taking the non-military option on Iran, for now.

 

Trump is going to squeeze the Ayatollah regime out of Iran, and return Iran to a Western-aligned nation.

 

Iran was conquered by radical Islam in 1979, and Trump is undoing it.

Anonymous ID: 329d09 Jan. 12, 2026, 5:14 p.m. No.24113407   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3412 >>3414 >>3459 >>3583 >>3596 >>3634 >>3776 >>3895 >>3929

Well, well, well, look what Tim Walz signed into law in 2020…

 

Whoopsie. Look what Tampon Tim signed into law back in 2020. As the circus over the George Floyd protests raged on, Minnesota’s Legislature updated its “use-of-force” statute, and Gov. Walz signed it into law that July.

 

Heather 007:

 

Well, well, well…Look what Tim Walz signed into law in 2020:

 

MN law §609.066: Officers can use deadly force if a driver accelerates toward them, creating immediate life-threatening danger. No need to wait for impact—they can act based on apparent intent & proximity.

 

JUSTIFIED.

 

Well, well, well…Look what Tim Walz signed into law in 2020:

 

MN law §609.066: Officers can use deadly force if a driver accelerates toward them, creating immediate life-threatening danger. No need to wait for impact—they can act based on apparent intent & proximity.

 

JUSTIFIED. pic.twitter.com/rjJh5hlI6O

 

— Heatherheather007 (@LibertyValkyrie) January 12, 2026

 

It’s real.

 

Under Minnesota Statute 609.066, peace officers may use deadly force only when a reasonable officer believes it’s necessary to protect against death or great bodily harm. And it’s all based on the totality of circumstances known at the moment, not some hindsight debate after the fact.

 

Revisor.mn

 

Subd. 2.Use of deadly force.

(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 609.06 or 609.065, the use of deadly force by a peace officer in the line of duty is justified only if an objectively reasonable officer would believe, based on the totality of the circumstances known to the officer at the time and without the benefit of hindsight, that such force is necessary:

 

(1) to protect the peace officer or another from death or great bodily harm, provided that the threat:

 

(i) can be articulated with specificity;

 

(ii) is reasonably likely to occur absent action by the law enforcement officer; and

 

 

moar

https://revolver.news/2026/01/well-well-well-look-what-tim-walz-signed-into-law-in-2020/

Anonymous ID: 329d09 Jan. 12, 2026, 5:41 p.m. No.24113523   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3569 >>3579

The more details emerge, the fewer of the corporate media’s claims about the Minneapolis car-ramming of an ICE agent turn out to be true.

 

If you’ve only paid attention to the legacy media over the past few days, you probably know more about Renee Good’s poetry than you do about the actions that led to her tragic death last Wednesday. After refusing federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers’ commands to get out of her car, which she had used to impede agents’ access to a neighborhood road, Good was caught on video accelerating her SUV toward one agent with another hanging on her door. The agent in front of her vehicle fatally shot her as the car appeared to hit him.

 

The corporate press, with help from the Democrats to whom they run for comment, portrayed Good as a victim of spontaneous violence, a “woman [who] drops her kid off at school, not involved in protest activity or anything, [but] seems to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.” The more details emerged, the fewer of those claims turned out to be true.

  1. Good Was Just Driving ‘Past’ Agents

 

A narrative quickly formed insisting that Good’s vehicle wasn’t pointed at the ICE agents at all but was directed away from them.

 

Someone at Axios Twin Cities approved a headline on Wednesday that said “ICE shoots, kills person in Minneapolis in vehicle that drove past agents.” The story’s lede was even worse: it claimed the ICE agent “shot and killed a 37-year-old woman who was in a vehicle that drove close to federal agents” (emphasis added).

 

In similar fashion, The Washington Post ran a headline at the top of its online front page Thursday morning that claimed the agent “was not in the vehicle’s path” when he fired his handgun. After criticism, the Post changed the headline to say the agent “fired at driver as vehicle veered past him,” without a correction notice. (The same article frames Good’s acceleration toward the agent as navigating “in the correct direction of traffic on the one-way street.”)

 

But regardless of whether Good intended to hit the officer, it’s obvious from video footage that from the officer’s visual perspective, her car was aimed directly at him. Multiple videos appear to show her vehicle actually hitting him — which would make the Post’s claim that he was “not in the vehicle’s path” something of an impossibility.

  1. Agent Was ‘Knocked Backward But Not Hit’

 

PBS had perhaps the most baffling description, saying the agent “appears to be knocked backward but not hit.”

 

A local ABC affiliate said there were “several feet of separation between the SUV and the ICE agent” and “No ICE agents appeared to be hit.”

 

But multiple videos of the event — including one filmed by the agent himself — appear to show the vehicle come into contact with the officer. The agent’s father also confirmed to media that his son had been hit by Good’s vehicle.

  1. Good’s Car Was in Reverse

 

Multiple news outlets used deceptive phrasing to imply that Good was backing away from the officers, rather than accelerating toward them, when she was shot. The Washington Post falsely stated that the agent was “shooting … as the driver reverses and pulls away.” (That bit of reporting came under the headline: “Woman killed by ICE in Minneapolis was a mother of 3 and a poet.”)

 

The Economist pulled a similar stunt, claiming Good “reversed, and tried to drive away” when she was shot. Video footage clearly shows she was rapidly accelerating toward agents when she was killed.

  1. Good Just Happened to Be There After School Drop-Off

 

People Magazine claimed Good “Had Just Dropped 6-Year-Old Off at School When She Encountered ICE,” as if she had accidentally ended up in the wrong place at the wrong time. The Guardian said she “was driving home with her partner when they encountered a group of ICE agents on a snowy street,” citing an AP interview with Good’s ex-husband. The ex-husband also told the AP she was “no activist,” a claim that was quickly repeated.

 

But reporting by the New York Post on Thursday indicated Good was part of an activist group dubbed “ICE Watch,” which the Post described as “dedicated to disrupting ICE raids” in Minneapolis. A mother from the school where Good’s child attends told the Post that Good “was trained against these ICE agents — what to do, what not to do, it’s a very thorough training.”

 

Another video showed Good’s vehicle blocking the street minutes before the altercation, further disproving the claim that she did not intend to obstruct ICE operations.

  1. Good Simply ‘Panicked’

 

It’s impossible to read minds, but that didn’t stop members of the media from speculating that Good lurched her vehicle forward in a state of innocent panic.

 

 

https://thefederalist.com/2026/01/12/corporate-medias-7-most-brazenly-fake-claims-about-the-anti-ice-car-ramming/

Anonymous ID: 329d09 Jan. 12, 2026, 5:44 p.m. No.24113535   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Patel fired 'corrupt' FBI agents in anti-Trump Arctic Frost inquiry who 'weaponized' law enforcement

 

President Trump called the FBI agents involved in Arctic Frost "Radical Left Lunatics" and demanded they be fired. Kash Patel revealed the "corrupt" agents had already been terminated.

 

FBI Director Kash Patel revealed Monday that he had fired the “corrupt” FBI agents involved in the bureau’s anti-Trump Arctic Frost investigation who had “weaponized” the law enforcement agency after President Donald Trump on Monday shared new revelations unearthed by Just the News.

 

An FBI supervisor who openly opposed Trump on social media played a crucial role in igniting the controversial Arctic Frost probe in 2022 related to January 6, with the bureau special agent pressing to add the former president as a formal subject of the investigation and circulating articles from liberal activists and leftwing news sources to make his case, according to evidence recently turned over to Congress and published by Just the News over the weekend.

 

“These FBI Agents are total Scum, in their own way no better than the insurrectionists in Portland, Minnesota, Los Angeles, etc. Kash better get them out, NOW!” Trump said in a Monday post on his Truth Social account. “Radical Left Lunatics put in by the ‘Auto Pen’ [Biden] and Obama!”

 

Patel quickly responded with a Truth Social post of his own.

 

“Thank you Mr. President. Under your leadership, this FBI found the corrupt actors and terminated their employment last year,” the FBI director said. “America voted for the end of weaponized law enforcement, and that’s what we are delivering.”

 

FBI Special Agent Timothy Thibault, who left his role as the assistant agent in charge of its Washington field office in August 2022 after his anti-Trump social posts became public, organized the initial electronic communication that authorized the start of the Arctic Frost probe.

 

He also circulated articles and podcasts by email from such anti-Trump outlets as Just Security, NPR, the Daily Beast, and The Washington Post, pushing for a criminal probe of Trump related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, the memos published by Just the News show.

 

When Thibault's colleagues originally drafted the investigation's launch document to focus on the Trump campaign and affiliated and still unknown subjects, "Add DJT" was scribbled onto the draft memo. Emails indicate Thibault was pushing to add Trump to the investigative launch document.

 

Revelations include emails from 2022 where Thibault shared articles and podcasts critical of Trump, including a prosecution-style memo authored by a former Obama DOJ official.

 

Thibault also sought to promote media coverage from outlets with left-leaning perspectives, such as NPR, as well as podcasts produced by The Daily Beast. The focus of these articles were Trump’s alleged crimes and efforts to overturn the election.

 

An unearthed email from April 2022 showed Thibault approving the opening of Arctic Frost.

 

These revelations continue to put the spotlight on Thibault, whom Republicans argue showed extreme anti-Trump bias, demonstrated a willingness to target Trump early in his first term, attempted to slow walk or block the FBI’s investigation into Hunter Biden, and in April 2022 helped spark the Arctic Frost investigation — later carried on by special counsel Jack Smith — which led to criminal charges against Trump related to the Capitol riot.

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/patel-fired-corrupt-fbi-agents-anti-trump-arctic-frost-inquiry-who-weaponized