yup they purposely made the statute for a reason. shill here tried saying it wouldnt hold up in court. slam dunk especially sub 2.1(i) was edited because of a lawsuit and got the provision changed from "can be articulated with specificity; by the officer" to "can be articulated with specificity;" the officer doesnt need to articulate specifically the harm present but has to posses the subjective fear
no the officer had to articulate in more detail prior