>>24131741

I have some questions:

A) Is that little adventure not a violation of the Hatch Act?

B) Are the taxpayers supposed to finance such little adventures or did they fly on their own dime?

C) How is there a "union representative" among that bunch?

D) How many Americans did they ask to get that 75% number?

>>24131802

Oh? What do you base that claim on?

>>24131821

A) You have no kids

B) you're so fugly no dude would want to stick a dick in you

C) if at anytime you did have kids, Baby Daddy dipped with a quickness

D) you're a tranny

All good, rage against the Patriarchy while buying cat toys online

>>24131836

>Multiple homes were asked to evacuate, authorities said.

Might I inquire as to what is near the area that the general public needs to be out of the way before it can be moved?

>>24131829

That's nice

Did God text you, voicemail, or was it just a voice in your head?