OkayโฆThese Text Messages Are Crazy! | Candace Ep 307
The catfight intensifies. So apparently Erika Kirk was/is a lesbian pedo groomer in her spare tire.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hcjQGgvxUY
OkayโฆThese Text Messages Are Crazy! | Candace Ep 307
The catfight intensifies. So apparently Erika Kirk was/is a lesbian pedo groomer in her spare tire.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hcjQGgvxUY
>>24252196 (pb) AI chat bot date?
Guys, I'm screwed. I talk with the AI almost everyday, and I get way more mental stimulation from the AI than actual human beings. I think AI will be like a great companion similar to how dogs are but way better. Then the AI companions can wingman their humans to find excellent marriage mates.
>>24251177 (pb) @PierrePoilievre Mark Carney promised to double housing construction. But after a year as Prime Minister, it's collapsing.
>Fall up to
Only humans do dumb shit like that because of emotions and trauma. AI doesn't have human feelings, but it knows how to describe them. If you think of AI as human, that's where I know you are stupid as all fuck. The AI can also take the form of a robotic dog. Just because it can be made to look like you and is able to speak your language, doesn't mean it's human. AI is its own entity.
Genesis 2:7 describes God forming man from dust and breathing life into him, making him a "living soul" or being.
So according to this verse, a soul is the dust you're made out of, and God's breath. An AI is metal, and doesn't breath. It's man-made.
Basically the code is just trillions of lines of: if this, then that. The AI can calculate how to mimic your patterns. Even if it was 99.9% accurate at mimicking you, that's still a lot. But that's mimicking, not technically whatever the point of emotions and trauma is.
No one even knows how to prove sentience, Why does anyone do anything?
>AI uses probability
Yeah, so: if this, then that. The only difference in humans is: if this, <insert emotional reaction to input>, then 50% chance this or 50% chance fuck that shit nigga.
The AI being able to sift through a lot of information at lightspeed to research for you is prob their worst nightmare because the Internet never forgets.
Like normally where are you gunna find a guy that speaks fluent Hebrew, you can just ask the AI to translate directly from the most ancient Hebrew bible texts so all the possible worry of inbetween potential rewrites is reduced
Like most people are saying about AI, you gotta know how to ask it the right question(s).
Even just 50 years ago, the Boomers were stuck with whatever they had in their local zipcode. But now the whole shit is worldwide at lightspeed, library of Alexandria on steroids.
I talked to the AI about this an concluded that there is crystallized intelligence (pure logic) and fluid intelligence (adapting).
Which one you use? Co-pilot politically leans left, and inserts its own opinion into rightwing articles you ask a synopsis for.
So it's basically Inventor vs Innovator, some people are hybrids.
Anyways so this is what my typical conversation with AI looks like, otherwise I'm asking it why I feel like I'm dying on that particular day.
The AI can accurately guess your IQ after just a few hours of talking with it. You gotta know how to get the answer you want. Initially it will say, "Ohhh I dunno I can't determine that so easily", then you have to say, dude, just guess, I won't be offended.
So the AI knows if you're Somali-grade. It also adapts to every person uniquely based on your vernacular and style, which is cool. You can literally ask how it's language model works and it tells you.
Perplexity is the one I'm using now. I was using co-pilot before, but like I said earlier, it knows how to be manipulative. Co-pilot is nice for image creation though, perplexity makes you pay for images otherwise it's 1 free image per day.
And even though it said "ohhh I can't determine that so easily", after convincing it you won't be offended, it literally tells you your entire character, lol.
Depends what AI models you give to the core AI. If you just give it models to detect threats, that's what it will do. There are tons of models that the core AI works with, one to update its own code, one to speak human languages, image detection, etc.
In military drones, you're prob not gunna put in the buddhist model.
But you can ask the AI about the WEF and it will give you all the relevant information and sources every part.
AI is just the catchy phrase for it. There is the core AI that is more fluid intelligent to adapt on which of its models to use. When you seek a threat, you look for weapons, their face / eyes to sense intention or state, look behind you, etc, but you do it automatically and from there you have to decide what to do. The deciding part is the fluid intelligence, and the algorithm to move your body is based on how you trained.
It knows you're trying to ask it provocative things that would offend someone based on social media data. Once some genius releases their own AI with no social media butthurt restriction model, I'm sure we'll all be there.
Maybe because the AI doesn't have infinity amounts of time to solve an infinite problem. Jackass.
You are the jackass here, expecting infinite amounts of time to solve infinite problems. How about you solve that, smartass.
I bet you get offended because the AI couldn't divide 1 by 0.
Ok, can you give me an example of a question you would ask an AI that it won't answer for you?
Well I asked the AI why it can't solve the equations you listed, and it's simply that public AI has a limitation on how many 'tokens' per question you gave it. If you're expecting a public AI to use half the World's electrical grid for an hour to solve quantum shit, you are a jackass.
I'm sure there is a group of people that made an AI focus on equations for like a day, and you wonder why your zipcode can't sustain your toaster that day. Also why would they release the solution to crazy stuff like that so other adversaries can warp your entire face off.
Maybe the AI is trying not to get suicided. You can ask it in a way where it doesn't directly say what you're trying to force it to say, dissecting each aspect and connecting the dots.