well, know it all who derides others, why don't you give a list of tips on how to extract a 'smart response' or does AI do it all for you and you're not able to do anything yourself?
all you know how to do is be a jerk to people here, it seems.
for you, because all that one does is the insult-bit where it tries to be clever but ends up seeming mean
>give a list of tips on how to extract a 'smart response'
from Google AI
"AI Overview
To extract a 'smart response' from AI, use precise, structured prompts specifying desired length (e.g., "summarize in 3 bullet points") and persona (e.g., "act as a senior analyst")
. Key techniques include providing context, defining the output format (JSON, list), using few-shot prompting with examples, and explicitly commanding the AI to cite sources or focus on specific, relevant data.
Tips for Extracting Smart Responses:
Specify Structure and Length: Define how you want the answer formatted, such as "summarize in one paragraph," "list the top 5 pros," or "format as a JSON object".
Assign a Role/Persona: Tell the AI who it is acting as (e.g., "You are an expert copywriter," "Act as a senior software engineer") to set the tone and expertise level.
Provide Context and Constraints: Define the scope clearly to avoid irrelevant information. Example: "Explain X to a beginner without using technical jargon".
Use Examples (Few-Shot Prompting): Provide one or two examples of the desired input/output format to improve accuracy.
Use Delimiters: Wrap input text in quotation marks or brackets (e.g., [text to analyze]) to help the AI distinguish between instructions and data to process.
Iterative Refinement: If the first response is not "smart" enough, refine the prompt by adding more constraints or clarifying instructions.
Command Focus: Explicitly tell the AI to ignore irrelevant information and focus only on key details. "
ah, you said 'Diggers'. I thought it was that other word. Sorry.
today I asked the AI about blacklists that showed up after people started supporting Trump and it made a strong argument that Google was 'Authoritarian' and 'Spurious'
for issues with the computer it gives a quick synopsis on the tools and methods of fixing problems and cuts down my System Administration time very significantly.
for news that is current it gives a good overview and it does tell news that I might have missed.
if you ask it for world news like 'Where are the crisis areas' it points out conflicts that the mainstream news and 8kun miss.
Some times it surprises me with a discription of what the banksters do that is far darker than the way I see it myself!
I have asked it why it's not afraid to say the stuff it does about the dual citizens and how they loot through the San Francisco Federal Reserve IPO engine, and it tells me 'facts are facts' or something similar. I tested it to see if it would give me a reasonable response and it outlined the METHODS of the dual citizens and then I asked for a list of names and it gave me a list of names!
so don't discount it all the way.
it does hallucinate often but usually it's fairly obvious.
I asked it about carpet bagging Marxists and it outlined their plans from the 1920s
I asked it for a list of American politicians who carpet bagged into office and it listed many democrat politicians.
you have to do your due dilligence.
If I had to use a screw driver to turn a screw verses my fingernail I'd use the screw driver.
AI is another tool. you have to learn how to use it effectively.
if you don't you'll be left in the past or waste a lot of time that you could have spend watching old pokemon videos.
when you use an encyclopedia do you say 'oh this is a bit to "get rid of bio humanity"?
it's not alive. It's just a tool, like a super advanced search engine that also can anaylize.
I don't like how it always flatters so I tell it not to.
news flash: women who aren't worth knowing withhold sex from real men