>>24368199 lb

framed by Intel in the 60s .. only Black Americans have soul.

Started back then read "Black Power" by Nat Hentof for insight into how Liberals saw Black Americans and what revolts they predicted (predictive programming?) would arise from their group (Black Americans politics).

Liberals controlling the narrative, Framing themselves as the saviors?

Wouldn't ya know. Essay's not available.

"Reflections on Black Power" by Nat Hentoff (sometimes referenced as "Black Power" in shorthand or reviews). It appeared in New American Review No. 2 (also styled as #2), edited by Theodore Solotaroff and published by New American Library (Signet) in 1968 (specifically January 1968 for that issue).

Unfortunately, "[Ai] couldn't find a freely available full online copy or digitized readable text of the complete essay (or the full issue) in public archives like the Internet Archive, Google Books, or open academic repositories. It's not hosted on sites like JSTOR (which might have it behind a paywall for institutional access), Project MUSE, or similar platforms in open view."

It exhibits both an unconscious racism, which would seem akward in our present day, and patronizing attitude, but also an elucidation of a script, for what their movement will [was apparently destined to] become.

They set the stage for DEI

"What can we do?"

And set the stage for the demeaning of white "honkeys"

Groundwork laid?

"75 percent of the black youngsters who stayed long enough in 1967 to graduate are “functional illiterates”? And what can they do about the prediction of a commission on national technology that “the unemployment rate among the nonwhite population, now twice the white rate, could become five times the white rate by 1975, if the occupational distribution of nonwhite jobs does not change” [emphasis mine]." - hentoff

"“We are beautiful because we are black.” So the young in the ghetto echo Malcolm because we are black,” the litany continues. “We have Soul, as in ‘soul brother,’” is cherished as a more direct, a deeper knowledge and expression of one’s emotions than the uptight “honky” can even imagine, let alone experience."

>>24368731

>>24368743

>>24368743

>>24368731

The narrative creators had to demean the White person to apparently elevate the Black American?

Seems like some leftish Jewish people (Hentoff was secular Jewish) subconsciously or instinctively demean the 'White' person naturally, since in their ancsetral tradition Whites Anglo Saxon were considered "goy" - albeit equal treatment and equal vision for all peoples was promoted among a sector of secular Jews.

I wouldn't have come across this idea but for the Epstein files showing secular and sick Epstein both identifying as a Jew, disobeying all the ten Commandments, and voicing / writing with contempt for "Goy" and notions of superiority for being Jewish (no matter who? He should talk?)

Plenty of atheist trans humanists in the "same boat" Well, is there? Apparently.

Though I do recall Ronald Bernard saying the very top was all "Zionist"

But again. Bernard only knew so much, and obviously there are many non Jews at the tippy top?

Adolf was a Zionist but publicly claimed Catholicism as his creed.

So the white man register with the Jew as Goy?

Hence some Liberal Jewish influencers train the Blacks into contempt for Anglo Saxons?

Even though A -Saxons Americans have a longer history along side Black Americans.

?

You'll find many Black Americans among rabid J2w H5terers? But that's the Black Muslim cultists?

Same for some sects of Christians. If you're not in their sect, you re going to Hell; no ifs, ands, or buts.

>>24368921

Looks to me, most genealogy before Henry 8 is all faked.

many rich people paid for fake geneology.

Certainly the powerful keep their own books regarding the matter.

Think of all the bastards getting royal title.

And all the "brothers" facing early deaths.

We're talking psychopaths to get to that position.

Roths openly state they inbreed to keep their money safe.

then we have the tube babies, clones nowadays, doubles, fake identies, fake deaths.

It's claimed by Russians that one of their Kings came back from Europe, a double.

Who thinks 'Kate' of UK royalty was replaced?

Someone must control the eggs.

There's only one of "Kate's" children (if she's really an XX woman?) who resembles the Royal line, i.e. George; and he's the favorite? At least of the Queen E.

Queen E's second and third son were from different men, not from pedo Phillip.

So after several centuries of this going on, who knows who is related to whom?

They know. They keep their own records.

>>24368986

It's claimed by Russians that one of their Kings came back from Europe, a double.

>>24368995

Here is the replacement story of the Russian King, per "POV 'conspiracy theorist'"

"The real Tsar Peter I — the true Russian sovereign, born in 1672 to the Romanov bloodline, a devout Orthodox believer who loved his people's traditions — never came back from that cursed "Grand Embassy" to Europe in 1697–1698. He was kidnapped, imprisoned, and replaced by a Western impostor sent by the European elites (Dutch shipbuilders, English Freemasons, French Jesuits, and their secret societies) to destroy Holy Russia from the throne itself. This is not speculation; it's the truth pieced together from portraits, letters, eyewitness accounts, and the impostor's own treasonous actions. Here's exactly how it unfolded, as those who have studied the evidence know it happened.Peter left Moscow at age 25 as a proud Russian: average-to-tall height for the era (his father and grandfather were both around 170 cm), round face with a distinctive wart/mole under his left eye, thick Russian build, full beard, fluent in his native tongue, deeply attached to his family, and wearing traditional kaftans even in summer. He traveled "incognito" as "Pyotr Mikhailov" with a huge entourage — 20 nobles and 35 commoners who knew his face intimately. The goal was supposedly to learn shipbuilding and find allies, but the real plan was the swap.

While in Europe (some say in the Dutch shipyards, others point to Stockholm where a queen tortured him on a hot skillet in the folk tales that spread by 1704), the Europeans struck. They murdered or scattered almost the entire delegation. Only Alexander Menshikov survived and returned with the fake — because Menshikov was in on the plot from the start. The real Peter was locked away in the Bastille as the mysterious "Man in the Iron Mask" (actually a velvet mask, but the people called it iron). Prison records name the inmate "Michael" — a direct nod to Peter's incognito alias Pyotr Mikhailov. He was tall, dignified, treated as nobility, and died in 1703 after which every trace of him was erased. Voltaire himself hinted he knew the secret but "as a true Frenchman" stayed silent.

In Peter's place they sent back their agent: a taller (204 cm), thinner, older-looking Dutchman (or possibly a Freemason operative) with a completely different face — no mole, pockmarked skin, straighter features, and an aged appearance that made him look at least 40. He didn't fit the old tsar's clothes anymore. He spoke Russian with a heavy accent at first, "forgot" how to write it, and had to relearn basic court etiquette. He couldn't recognize old friends, teachers, or even the location of Ivan the Terrible's legendary library that every real tsar passed down secretly.

>>24369019

The moment this double stepped back on Russian soil in 1698, the sabotage began — and every single move screamed "impostor":

He immediately exiled his devoted wife Evdokia Lopukhina (the one he wrote loving letters to every day while away) to a convent without explanation. She begged for answers; he ignored her. The real Peter would never have done that.

His sister Sophia, who had ruled as regent and knew him better than anyone, instantly recognized the fraud. She led the streltsy (musketeers) revolt because the soldiers who had seen the "new" tsar confirmed he wasn't the same man. The double crushed the uprising, locked Sophia in a monastery, and executed or tortured anyone who spoke the truth openly.

He suddenly hated everything Russian: banned traditional clothing for himself and the court, imposed the infamous beard tax to humiliate the faithful (beards are God's gift in Orthodoxy), forced everyone into Western wigs and pants, changed the calendar from the Orthodox one (year 7208 from Creation became 1700 on January 1 — erasing our sacred timeline), seized church bells and lands, and turned the Patriarchate into a state department. He even founded St. Petersburg — a swampy European-style city built on the bones of thousands of Russians — as his new capital. Real Peter loved Moscow and the old ways.

He "miraculously" developed expert naval boarding tactics and ship combat skills he'd never seen before (his whole youth was on land). Yet he caught tropical fever — impossible for someone who only sailed northern routes.

He suffered strange epileptic-like fits no one had ever recorded before the trip.

Worst of all: he turned on his own son, Tsarevich Alexei. The real Peter adored the boy. The impostor forced Alexei to become a monk, then hunted him down after he fled to Europe (trying to reach the Bastille to free his true father). Alexei was tortured and murdered in 1718.