>>24379707 tyb
As anons, we should provide President Trump with options. Marines are being deployed, never forget, we are their voice.
Last bread I gave a discourse on logic and promises. Part of the problem is that no one knows for sure if all is going as planned or not. We should at least by offering options to a settled negotiation, as an option for both the US and Iran. For example, if Iran hits another cargo ship, Trump said Kharg oil will be hit, but these are side affects to the goal of regime change. Iran promises to hit Gulf oil supplies. Marines are on their way. Lets take a pause and think…
>these are side affects to the goal of regime change
Now what path or paths has to exist in order for this to be accomplished?
What would be the minimum?
>What would be the minimum?
Think Security Guarantees.
The regime will fight to the death not so much to stay in power, because they should realize with all the people who protested in their country, around the world, and how many cheered the Ayatollah's death, that there is no way to survive, especially after attacking Gulf states, but what comes after them. With this security requirement in mind, what would be an amiable proposal that would bring them to the table? They would have to have immunity and a voice in who will lead their country next, instead of being dictated by the West or Zionist infidels. You see, immunity alone isn't the problem solely. It is what comes after, what they see happens to their country, the safeguards that they have in mind, the future of those that supported them, the welfare of the country after they step down. So based these logic variables, why not incorporate them into the decision process, where they can be part of the selection process, where they can see that all their security requirements are terminated or resolved?
>So based these logic variables, why not incorporate them into the decision process, where they can be part of the selection process, where they can see that all their security requirements are terminated or resolved?
This is only one facet out of a multifaceted problem and is exemplified as just a proposed solution to the required path to find. It can be a starting or ending point, until the logic variable of all objections are resolved. Hope that is clear.
>until the logic variable of all objections are resolved
This was just one option as a solution. Another one to consider, is requesting a day of reflection for those that have died in this conflict. Cease hostilities for the day, allow all to reflect on those that have lost their lives, that we may all consider our failures in a great understanding. When the time is right and all objections are resolved, this could be a starting or ending point. These types of solutions are not win lose situations, but win win for all. When is the right time? You should know, if you followed previous discourses.
We work for our Service members who are putting their lives on the line, no questions asked. It is our job to be their voice. Keeping that in mind, what are the immediate goals and objectives to resolve this crisis either in full or partially. A partial equation is still an equation that needs at least one input.
All things are resolvable once all variables are known when it comes to path finding. By keeping our primatives pure as in our word and values, we can easily understand the current state, but when those definitions become arbitrary values, then it is impossible to reason about our current state and we need to do path finding once our system goes into an accidental state, which is just a series of unexpected events that accumulate over time.
It is imperative that Mr. Canel take up my offer from yesterday and resolve the equation asap. There is no benefit to cracking down on this type of civil unrest because it leads to more violence and then the future turns into a series of waiting for and eventually dealing with actual clashes. Give the people bread, the US will recognize Cuba, and make you the first governor of the State of Cuba. The people will be relieved and no deaths or property damages will occur.
>but when those definitions become arbitrary values, then it is impossible to reason about our current state and we need to do path finding once our system goes into an accidental state, which is just a series of unexpected events that accumulate over time.
If you listen to this lady >>24379799, you will see this in action. Because definitions, values, and your word were arbitrary values, the current state is corrupt, and now she is requesting a historical analysis and search as path finding.
Although this is a uncertain time for Cuba going forward, and their current state is in an undesirable place, if he listens to me, immediately, there will be no lose of life and property, nor civil unrest, but he would actually be credited with making Cuba the 51st State of USA, be the first Governor of the State, and go down in history as the man who saved Cuba and Cubans from terrible destruction. Unfortunately the time constraints are against him and me, and I do not have the time to prove to him, how I know all these things in advance with surety. All I can tell him is that: I am, always right.
Did President Trump make a post with a missing comma just last night? Solve for X.
It is about the Break!!!
It is about to Break!!!