OPINION
INGERSOLL: Does Anyone Know What ‘Imminent’ Means?.1/2.-3
Geoffrey Ingersoll. 3/20/26
WHAT DO THESE WORDS MEAN?
A lot has been said recently about the word “imminent.”
Webster’s (which was reliable in most cases until woke got to it) defines it as “ready to take place” or “happening soon.”
By the first definition, you’re in imminent danger every day on your commute. Things being simply ready to happen — having potential —doesn’tstrike me asparticularly “imminent.” Thesecond definitionseems much more accurate.Its immediacy is evident. “Happening soon” is already in motion. It’s coming, and the when is just an undefined blob, as irritating to the mind as the answer your mom gives you when you ask for the 97th time “WHEN DO WE GET THERE?”
“Soon.”
>At a private lunch recently with various right-wing communicators, one of themasked me bluntly, “What do you make of Joe Kent’s resignation letter?”
I started by saying it seemed like par for the course when it comes to high-profile firings and resignations in the Trump era.People, like Kent, have a sudden change of heart. They go from ruthless supportto self-righteous rebellion. As a result,Trump Inc. goes full murder hornet on the rebel’s credibility.
We saw thisexact scenariowith John Bolton.
Like Bolton, the Trump camp is now saying Kent had been quarantined for “months.” He was never trustworthy. Loyal soldiers online are now dissecting Kent’s history in support of their God King.
It all prompts the question:Well, then why’d you hire him in the first place?And that’s one Trump simply bulldozes right past.
(On Bolton, he told me flatly, “I liked John because bad people were terrified of him.”)
But that’s not what she meant by the question.
She stopped me with, “But do you think it’s true?”
“What specifically?”
“That there was ‘no imminent threat’ from Iran?”
Ahhh, I should have known, the debate du jour. And as the only combat veteran at the table, also the only reporter with national security history, I should have known they’d ask.
At risk of sounding like former President Bill Clinton under deposition, I answered, “Well, that depends entirely on how you define ‘imminent.’”
My boxing coach has said it multiple times.
“There’s no such thing as a sucker punch.”
Of course, there is, Dear Reader, but that’s not exactly what he means.In Lenel’s universe, there are only winners and losers. There are people who are knocked out, on the pavement, at the whims of their aggressors (and trust me, that doesn’t end well),and there are people who are still conscious. The winners.
“Whoever started this ‘never hit first’ garbage has either never been in a fight or was someone’s mom,” he says. “Obviouslyyou hit first. If you can’t run away. If you know violence is going to happen.You always hit first.”
I’m not going to give you an analysis of the war, its wisdom or folly, its potential third and fourth order effects. I’m just here to talk dollars and cents.
And dollars to donuts, Iran was gearing up. China was helping.
Here is a screencap from a U.S.-China Economicand Security Commissionreport. They are a review committee independent of the federal government that reports to Congress.
Security Cooperation
• China was a major supplier of conventional weapons to Iran in the 1980s but largely stopped transfers in 2015 after UN Security Council Resolution 2231 increased international scrutiny of such transfers. 9 In recent years, security cooperationhas shifted toward dual-use technology salesand transfers of defense-related technologies, including those relevant to missile and drone development.[10] Chinese components-including sensors, voltage converters, and semiconductors-have been found in Iranian drones, both the drones used by its regional proxies and those exported to Russia for use in Ukraine.("]Continued….
https://dailycaller.com/2026/03/20/imminent-iran-war-trump-operation-epic-fury-israel-joe-kent/