Here's one for you, Sundar Pichai:

"Google is in advanced stages of plans to launch a custom Android search app in China that will comply with the Communist Party’s harsh censorship policies on human rights, democracy, free speech, and religion.

“This an extremely disappointing move,” says Eva Galperin, director of cybersecurity for the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Google’s willingness to censor its own results takes the onus away from the Chinese government.

“They are essentially using Google as a propaganda tool and Google is letting themselves be used.”

Google is a Hoe.

www.wired.com/story/google-might-be-ready-to-play-by-chinas-censorship-rules/

oh, no, not another one…

cst.

apnews.com/e3d81dc2b751474a98adb44b03811c03?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter&__twitter_impression=true&__twitter_impression=true&__twitter_impression=true&__twitter_impression=true&__twitter_impression=true&__twitter_impression=true

>>2441238

read the sauce:

IN 2010, GOOGLE made a moral calculus. The company had been censoring search results in China at the behest of the Communist government since launching there in 2006. But after a sophisticated phishing attack to gain access to the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists, Google decided to stop censoring results, even though it cost the company access to the lucrative Chinese market.

Across nearly a decade, Google’s decision to weigh social good over financial profit became part of Silicon Valley folklore, a handy anecdote that cast the tech industry as a democratizing force in the world. But to tech giants with an insatiable appetite for growth, China’s allure is just as legendary.

>>2441194

>>2441346

>>2441111

cst.

AnyAnon familiar with this heeyuh episode?

>>2441551

Very nize.

The TV epizode, mon ami…do you know eet?

>>2441584

TY, never heard of it myself.