Energy lockdowns begin

By Rhoda Wilson on March 31, 2026 • ( 15 Comments )

The world is experiencing the start of a new lockdown – this time related to energy use with the International Energy Agency (“IEA”) playing a key role, similar to the role the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) played during the covid-19 pandemic.

“Energy lockdown” refers to government-enforced or encouraged measures to reduce fuel, gas and electricity consumption in response to “global supply shocks.” The “energy lockdown” trend has gained momentum this month following the closure of the Strait of Hormuz due to the US-Israel-Iran conflict.

Is it just a coincidence that “energy lockdowns” will achieve what Globalists have been aiming for, for years?

As we read the Brownstone Institute’s article below, let’s recall that Globalists, who sometimes refer to themselves as internationalists, and their puppets have long been hoping to implement climate lockdowns:

Government report released in 2019 proves Lockdown was implemented to meet ‘Zero Carbon Targets’ enshrined in law, not because of Covid-19, 8 July 2021

International Energy Agency demands Worldwide Lockdowns to meet Climate Goals, 2 May 2022

Top 10 Most Dystopian Things Pushed by the World Economic Forum: No.4 Praising Massive Lockdowns, 14 June 2022

UK local governments are declaring a “climate emergency” and forming committees to implement dystopian plans, 11 June 2023

By 2030 you will not eat meat and you will be allowed only three items of new clothing a year, report says, 18 June 2023

IMF calls for restrictions on economic activity that far exceed covid lockdowns to avoid a “climate disaster”, 27 November 2024

more:

https://expose-news.com/2026/03/31/energy-lockdowns-begin/

STUDY: Half of COVID-19 Vaccinated Military Personnel Suffered Subclinical Heart Stress

Half—and most never knew. Let that sink in.

Apr 01, 2026

A newly published longitudinal biomarker study in Vaccine tracked cardiac markers in 83 healthy adult military personnel following two doses of COVID-19 mRNA injection (Pfizer or Moderna)—and the signal is striking.

Researchers analyzed multiple serial blood samples (up to 9 per participant) collected across pre- and post-vaccination timepoints, enabling a detailed view of short-term cardiac responses.

The results: 49% of participants exhibited a rise in NT-proBNP exceeding 1.5× their individual baseline within two weeks of the second dose—a clear indicator of increased cardiac strain. In practical terms, this means nearly half experienced at least a 50% increase in NT-proBNP levels. Notably, the odds of experiencing this cardiac stress signal were 13.5 times higher after vaccination compared to pre-vaccination baseline levels.

more:

https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/study-half-of-covid-19-vaccinated

What They Don't Tell You About the Shingles Vaccine

The headline number is 97% effective. The number that actually matters to you is closer to 3%. Both are true. Here's what's going on — and why the distinction matters.

Dr. Robert W. Malone

Apr 01, 2026

THE DISEASE

First, shingles is genuinely unpleasant

To fairly evaluate any vaccine, you have to start with the disease it prevents. Shingles is caused by the same virus that gave you chickenpox as a child — it never fully leaves your body. It retreats into your nervous system and can reactivate decades later, typically producing a painful, blistering rash that appears in a band on one side of your torso, face, or limbs.

For most people, the rash resolves in two to four weeks. But for a significant minority, roughly one in five people who get shingles, rising to nearly one in three among adults over 60, the pain doesn’t stop when the rash heals. This complication is called postherpetic neuralgia, or PHN. It’s a chronic nerve pain that can persist for months, years, or sometimes permanently, and is described by those who have it as burning, electric, and constant. It is associated with depression, sleep disruption, and social withdrawal.

Most cases of shingles are mild to moderate and resolve within a few weeks, with 10–20% becoming “severe” in a meaningful clinical sense.

I have personally had shingles fifteen plus years ago, an unusual and rather nasty variant called intra-abdominal shingles. Inside your abdomen. I did not have medical insurance, and so I delayed treatment until I could not stand the pain. As a consequence, I developed a particularly nasty postherpetic neuralgia- a paralytic polio-like syndrome that caused a partial paralysis of the left side of my abdomen. Suffice to say, this created problems as an advanced equestrian. I quite literally lost my core. That said, I personally consider that a “natural” booster, and have never accepted the shingles vaccine. My body, my choice.

About 10–18% of shingles cases progress to PHN, which is the main long-term issue. There is no “cure” for PHN, as no drug will cure it. The treatments available are nerve-calming drugs, like gabapentin, antidepressants used as pain medications, and lidocaine patches, which help some people, but roughly 40 to 50 percent of PHN patients never achieve adequate pain relief from any available therapy. BTW - stating that there is “no cure” is medically acceptable language, but it lacks nuance. Most people do improve and even achieve complete recovery, gradually over time. But there is no treatment that will “cure” PHN - drugs will only help with the symptoms, so this is a significant nuance.

This matters for understanding the vaccine because preventing shingles also means preventing any chance of developing PHN. But how effective is the vaccine at actually doing that for any individual?

more:

https://www.malone.news/p/what-they-dont-tell-you-about-the