The City of London sending King Charles was a bust. He was only sent to convince Trump, America must take our orders.

When you watch it, Trump was not in agreement. Trump knew their plan because London was losing billions for the U.S. to provide insurance. And he knows their whole history.Trump was a lot more subtle than King Charles. It’s funny the king said he reads all secret ongoing like his mother did. He’s never been involved like his mother. He cannot have any coordination and excess of top secret plans and get info from the city of London. They know he’s not very bright and never got info like the Queen did all her life.

Any memes about him is fair game. The monarchy doesn’t rule anything today. And they won’t, the Monarchy is just mannequins at this point.

No one should forget, King Charles master goal is to rid the earth of millions of commoners because of Climate change.

Actually that’s probably just a lie, it’s not climate change that makes him wants to kill people. His real complaint is the common man shouldn’t be alive, because that’s been the NWO goals from 1,000s of years ago.

God Bless the ancient good kings from England that ruled their country by taking care of the people. That Era is done.Instead of the statement “No Kings”, it should be, “No stupid Kings”

The Bell will tole when the house and senate are revealed as traitors.

The reps are afraid to be taken out, by the left. Anyone not a traitor must stand strong and fight with all their might to save America.

Stand up, be strong, even if you lose or die, God will strengthen you and others will follow

All the Democrats are doing is to telling real Americans and those naturalized is saying to them,we no longer need you, we can defeat our countries laws, to make sure we win all the time.

The Dems fail to perceive that foreigners who stood in line for many years, to be a legal American citizens going through the process, will fight harder for our country than many.

Legal foreigners will, with all Americans with fight and defeat the Dems because they are basically installing the country with third world terrorists! They think their plan will win, so Dems can rule forever.

Warning to moderate democrats, get out, because your life is consumed with danger to uphold the constitution and be a loyal citizen.

Leave now! We are more valuable than the traitors that would destroy us and you by severe danger.

Just my opinion!

FEDERAL RESERVE

Fed holds rates steady but with highest level of dissent since 1992. 1/2

PUBLISHED WED, APR 29 20262:00 PM EDT

KEY POINTS

• An unusually divided Federal Reserve held its key interest rate steady.

•Policymakers are grappling with the challenge of balancing the threats of persistent inflation and a softening labor market.

•The meeting likely was the last with Chair Jerome Powell at the helm. He is due to step down from the top job in mid-May, although his term as a Fed governor doesn’t expire until January 2028.

An unusually divided Federal Reserve on Wednesday held its key interest rate steady as policymakers grappled with the policy impact of persistent inflation and awaited a looming leadership transition at the central bank.

In what may have been Chair Jerome Powell’s final meeting at the helm, the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee voted to hold the benchmark funds rate in a range between 3.5%-3.75%. Markets had been pricing in a 100% chance of no change.

However, the meeting saw a dramatic turn amid a groundswell of officials who opposed messaging that further rate cuts could be ahead.

Amid expectations for a routine vote to hold the benchmark funds rate steady, the Federal Open Market Committee instead was split along 8-4 lines, with officials expressing different reasons for their vote.

The last time four FOMC members dissented was in October 1992.

Governor Stephen Miran, as he has done since joining the central bank in September 2025, dissented in favor of a quarter percentage point cut.

The other three “no” votes came from regional presidents Beth Hammack of Cleveland, Neel Kashkari of Minneapolis and Lorie Logan of Dallas. They said they agreed with the hold but “did not support the inclusion of an easing bias in the statement at this time.”

At issue for the trio was this sentence: “In considering the extent and timing of additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will carefully assess incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks.”

The phrasing indicates the likelihood that the next move would be lower, implied by using the word “additional,” which reflects that the most recent rate actions have been to cut. Hammack, Kashkari and Logan, along with several other Fed officials, have warned about the dangers of persistent inflation. Higher prices augur higher rates for the Fed, which has been on an easing bias since the latter part of 2025.

‘Inflation is elevated’

In the post-meeting statement, the committee noted that, “Inflation is elevated, in part reflecting the recent increase in global energy prices.”

Markets had been widely expecting the hold and in fact are pricing in no changes the rest of this year and well into 2027. Fed officials at the March meetingindicated they foresee one cut this year then another in 2027, putting the funds rate down to its expected “neutral” level around 3.1%.

Stocks were lower on Wednesday, as oil prices shot higher and investors waited high-profile earnings from four of the “Magnificent Seven.”

The Fed’s decision marked the third consecutive meeting where the committee chose to stand pat – following three consecutive cuts last year.

For most of his eight years as chair, Powell has been able to maintain strong consensus among the committee even as the Fed has struggled to contain inflation and resist aggressive White House political pressure.

Policymakers, though, face an economic climate where inflation indeed has held well above the Fed’s 2% target, as President Donald Trump’s tariffs and soaring energy prices are complicating policy. Normally, Fed officials would look through the temporary price shocks from both factors, but the duration of the surges has raised concern about the longer-lasting consumer impact.

On the other side of the Fed’s so-called dual mandate, concerns have abated over the low-hire low-fire labor market.

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/29/fed-interest-rate-decision-april-2026.html

(Powell just collapsed the US’s need for the Fed)

>>24554467

2/2

Nonfarm payrolls in March grew by a better-than-expected 178,000, while the unemployment rate slipped to 4.3%. For April, payrolls processing firm ADP has reported average weekly private payroll growth around 40,000, further indicating that the jobs picture is healthy if less than robust.

With the rate decision behind it, attention will quickly turn to Powell’s post-meeting news conference. Markets usually watch the chair’s remarks closely for clues about the future direction of policy, but in this case the most prominent question will be whether Powell will stay on board after his term as chair ends in May.

Earlier in the day, the Senate Banking Committee in a party-line vote advanced President Donald Trump’s nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Fed chair. The full Senate is widely expected to follow suit, setting up the Fed’s first leadership change since Powell took over in 2018.

Powell’s choice

Powell faces a choice – leave now as Warsh comes on board, or serve out all or part of the remaining two years on his term as governor. Should Powell opt to stay, it would mark thefirst time a sitting chair didn’t leave the Boardof Governors since Marriner Eccles in 1948.

Powell and Eccles faced similar challenges in the form of White House pressure on monetary policy. In Eccles’ case, President Harry S. Truman pushed the Fed to keep rates low to help reduce government borrowing costs. Trump has pressured the Fed to help the housing and labor markets, and to help reduce the financing burden of the nation’s nearly $39 trillion national debt.

In the Eccles era, the clash led to the 1951 Treasury-Fed Accord, which helped formalize the Fed’s independence by creating a clear barrier between the two institutions.

Warsh has spoken of reopening the accordand modernizing it for the current era where the central bank’s fixed income holdings total some $6.7 trillion. The chair-elect has advocated strengthening the relationship with better coordination on debt issuance while furthering Warsh’s goal of lessening the Fed’s imprint in the bond market.

Powell has spoken strongly about Fed independence. A Justice Department effort to subpoena him over the Fed building renovation project has failed thus far, and a criminal probe into the matter has been dropped.

Among his reasons to stay would be to wait until the renovations probe – which U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro handed off to the Fed’s inspector general – is finished. Also, there are ongoing issues regarding independence that Powell could resist as a governor, among them the potential replacement of regional Fed presidents.

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/29/fed-interest-rate-decision-april-2026.html

i wouldn’t doubt that Powell gave a big gift to King Charles and England today

U.S. Supreme Court Voids Race-Based Redistricting Map in Louisiana

Katherine Hamilton29 Apr 2026

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down a race-based redistricting map in Louisiana,ruling that the state’s second black-majority district violates the Constitution.

The conservative majority ruled 6-3 that the ==map “is an unconstitutional gerrymander•=,” but stopped short of scrapping Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

“Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was designed to enforce the Constitution — not collide with it. Unfortunately, lower courts have sometimes applied this Court’s §2 precedents in a way that forces States to engage in the very race-based discrimination that the Constitution forbids,” Justice Alito wrote for the majority.

“This tension between §2 and the Constitution came to a head when Louisiana redrew its congressional districts after the 2020 census. In 2022, a federal judge in the Middle District of Louisiana held that the map adopted by the state legislature likely violated §2 because it did not include an additional majority-black district,” he continued.“But when the State drew a new map that contained such a district, its new map was challenged as a racial gerrymander. A three-judge court in the Western District of Louisiana held that the new map violated the Equal Protection Clause, and the State appealed to this Court.”

The Supreme Court heard arguments in Louisiana v. Callais on October 15. The court heard arguments in the last term in Junebut agreed to hear another round and ultimately considered whether race or politics was the state’s motivation and whether compliance with the Voting Rights Act justifies the intentional use of race in drawing legislative districts.

“For over 30 years, we have assumed for the sake of argument that the answer is yes. And we have gone further and assumed that it is enough if a State ‘ha[s] a strong basis in evidence’ for thinking that the Voting Rights Act requires race-based conduct,” Alito wrote. “But allowing race to play any part in government decision-making represents a departure from the constitutional rule that applies in almost every other context. These and other problems convinced us that the time had come to resolve whether compliance with the Voting Rights Act can indeed provide a compelling reason for race-based districting.”

“We now answer that question: Compliance with §2, as properly construed, can provide such a reason. Correctly understood, §2does not impose liability at odds with the Constitution, and it should not have imposed liability on Louisiana for its 2022 map” he wrote. “Compliance with §2 thus could not justify the State’s use of race-based redistricting here. The State’s attempt tosatisfy the Middle District’s ruling, although understandable, was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, and we therefore affirm the decision below.”

Justice Elena Kagan wrote a dissent for the three liberal-leaning justices, calling the consequences of the decision “likely to be far-reaching and grave.”

“Today’s decision renders Section 2 all but a dead letter,” Kagan wrote.

The case could massively impact midterm elections and the 2028 elections. Analyses by the New York Times and a left-wing group called Fair Fight Action found that between 12 and 19 Democratic congressional districts could be redrawn into GOP ones.

The case is Louisiana v. Callais, No. 24–109 in the Supreme Court of the United States.

(One of the biggest FAFO war of all time. The tide is changing. Spanberger thought she was so smart. She’ll waste her first and only term of VA because she tried to break the U.S. and VA Constitution.)

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/04/29/u-s-supreme-court-voids-race-based-redistricting-map-in-louisiana/

ECONOMIC FURY: Why Trump's Warning Went ONLY to Britain

(Bessent looks and sounds so nice, but he will fight for our Country in the most painful to the enemy way. KEK)

Susan Kokinda argues that recent U.S. actions framed as confronting Iran are actually aimed at dismantling the British imperial financial and geopolitical system. She cites Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s April 16 meeting with UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves, highlighting the on-record “Economic Fury” campaign and U.S. tracking of financial flows to Iran that allegedly lead to London. The episode shows Trump is ending a decades-old “world extortion” model tied to the Strait of Hormuz, Lloyd’s war-risk insurance, and London’s commodity pricing power (gold, metals, oil benchmarks). It also points to an Israeli–Lebanon ceasefire and Trump prohibiting Israeli strikes, arguing this removes Netanyahu’s leverage built on a perpetual Iran threat.With London’s pricing nodes shifting toward New York and the “special relationship” weakening, the Hudson Institute is said to be pinning hopes on a King Charles visit to the U.S.(oh my it didn’t work, but he got lots of claps from Congress)

12:13

https://youtu.be/SNbJMeDL6k4

>>24554553

Everyone is forgetting that Bessent and Soro’s team, took the Bank of London down and London lost billions and billions. Therefore Bessent negotiating with UK government bank leaders means London etc will never win this war with Trump, the U.S. with Bessent negotiating.

Sure he seems very nice, but the master of money comes out and explains their problem. The guy is really brilliant, but he’s not nice to cheaters trying to destroy the U.S.

Watters: Here's what REALLY went down…

Fox News host Jesse Watters discusses the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner and theresponses from several Democrats

(Has any of these media enemies considered to give Trump a part of the cut, when they make a ton of money and viewership they lost years ago?)

17:57

https://youtu.be/0qiFKy5rn6w

>>24554729 I have to say those agents didn’t even cover RFKjr’s head, when walking him to high ground== those guys seem extremely stupid, lazy or intentional