tyb
clothed with the sun and the stars
this link was at the bottom of the pentagon ufo page …
https://www.aaro.mil/
Welcome to the website for the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO). Our team of experts leads the U.S. government’s efforts to address Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) using a rigorous scientific framework and a data-driven approach. Thank you for visiting.
INTRODUCTION TO UAP
WHAT IS A UAP?
HOW CAN I SHARE INFORMATION WITH AARO OR REPORT A UAP?
WHAT ARE THE LEADING EXPLANATIONS TO ACCOUNT FOR UAP REPORTS?
WHAT ARE SOME COMMON OBJECTS/CAUSES FREQUENTLY REPORTED AS UAP?
HAS THE DEPARTMENT FOUND ANY EVIDENCE OF EXTRATERRESTRIAL TECHNOLOGY?
Flying Saucer
NAID: 303938034
Local ID: 255-GS-65-108
Photographs and other Graphic Materials
Produced: June 4, 1964
1 Image
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/303938034
trust the NSA
national security archives?
is this a created image? its from NASA 1964
I am here to discuss the so-called flying saucers. The Air Force interest in this problem has been due to a feeling of obligation to identify and analyze to the best of our ability anything in the air that may have any possibility of threat or menace to the United States. In pursuit of this obligation, since 1947, we have received and analyzed between one and two thousand reports that have come to us from all kinds of sources. Of this great mass of reports we have been able adequately to explain the great bulk of them. Explain them to our own satisfaction. We've been able to explain them as hoaxes, as erroneously identified friendly aircraft, as meteorological or electronic phenomena, or as light aberrations. However, there have been a certain percentage of this volume of reports that have been made by credible observers of relatively incredible things. It is this group of observations that we now are attempting to resolve. Our basic difficulty in dealing with these is that there is no measurement of them that makes it possible for us to put them in any pattern that would be profitable for a deliberate custom sort of analysis to take the next step. We have to date only come to one firm conclusion with respect to this remaining percentage. And that it is does not contain any pattern of purpose or of consistency that we can relate withto any conceivable threat to the United States. Is that We can say that the recent sightings are in no way connected with any secret development by any department of the United States. We can say that the recent sightings are in no way connected with any secret development by any agency of the United States. Major Keyhoe, as author of the book "Flying Saucers Are Real", what is your opinion of these new sightings of unidentified objects? With all due respect to the Air Force, I believe that some of them will prove to be of interplanetary origin. During a three year investigation I found that many pilots have described objects of substance and high speed. One case pilots reported their plane was buffeted by an object which passed them at five hundred miles an hour. Obviously this was solid object because I believe it was from outer space.
KONA Blue SAP?
paint certain roofs blue?
The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office
History and Origin of KONA BLUE
The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) first learned of the KONA BLUE
program from interviews conducted as part of its historical review. Multiple interviewees
identified KONA BLUE as a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) sensitive compartment
established to protect the retrieval and exploitation of "non-human biologics." AARO researched
the information provided by the interviewees and learned KONA BLUE was a Prospective
Special Access Program (PSAP) that had been proposed to DHS leadership but was never
approved or formally established. KONA BLUE never received any materials or funding, and
there is no information beyond the proposal presentation marked with the KONA BLUE name.
AARO traced the origin of the proposal for KONA BLUE to the Advanced Aerospace
Weapon System Application Program (AAWSAP)/Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification
Program (AATIP) program, which was managed by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)
from 2009-2012 and funded through congressional earmarks. Bigelow Aerospace, headquartered
in Nevada, served as the primary contractor executing funds for the program and delivered
multiple reports during the period of their contract. DIA terminated the program due to a cited
lack of merit and lack of utility in the products Bigelow produced for DIA’s mission.
When DIA canceled AAWSAP/AATIP, several individuals involved with that program
advocated for DHS to take the effort over and fund a new version of AAWSAP/AATIP under the
code name “KONA BLUE.” According to the proposal, KONA BLUE would continue the work
previously undertaken by DIA’s AAWSAP/AATIP to investigate, identify, and analyze sensitive
materials and technologies, to include advanced aerospace vehicles. In 2011, the DHS Under
Secretary for Science and Technology (S&T) established KONA BLUE as a PSAP based on
claims that relevant information and material existed and required this level of protection. The
Under Secretary (S&T) also cited congressional interest in the subject and possible impacts on
homeland security as part of the justification for the program. Six months later, however, the
Deputy Secretary of DHS disapproved KONA BLUE as a Special Access Program (SAP), and
further directed its immediate termination citing concerns about the adequacy of justification for
the program, and sufficiency of information central to the proposal development, including
personnel and budget requirements.
It is critical to note that while some DHS personnel believed that relevant information
and material would be delivered to DHS upon establishment of the SAP, no data or material of
any kind was ever transferred to or collected by DHS under the auspices of KONA BLUE.
Information associated with the activities conducted under the auspices of AAWSAP/AATIP
remains within DIA’s archived holdings.
This archived PSAP proposal and associated documents have been declassified in
partnership between DoD and DHS and are being released to the public in accordance with both
agencies’ commitment to transparency.
Other than a single instance of Attorney-Client material redacted from page 38 by DHS,