>>24691774 lb
>The 43,000 vote swing in the 5 days since election day that caused Socialist Nythia Raman to overcome Common Sense Spencer Platt's 8 percentage point lead while incumbent Communist Karen Bass not only did not gain over the same 5 days, but actually lost a percentage point or two, is the same number as homeless on the streets in L.A. at any given time.
Anon corrects the above post: It is not that Karen Bass did not advance in the numbers of votes supposedly counted since election night 5 days before, she had, just not as much as her primary D challenger Raman.
Though Bass wss annointed as inevitably one of the top two on election night, she only had low 30s percentage points … and has since lost several of those to Raman.
That is what OP meant by saying Bass has not gained since election night.
Raman was an 11th hour announcement for mayor, literally hours before the filing deadline, was not endorsed by any of her fellow city council members where she has served for years as the city declined, cried in apparent defeat during her election night speech 6 days ago, and yet somehow has "surged" since, grabbing several percentage points off of both Bass and Pratt to now be "solidly" in second place and "projected" by some to be advancing in November against Bass, with Pratt, they are presuming, eliminated.
As a result, in a Dem v Dem general, a Dem will nevitably be mayor, again. Either one who let the city burn or one who was "in charge" at L.A. city council, as Pratt says, of the failed homelessness "fight."
Makes zero sense.
What exactly was the "break the glass" scenario that Newscum shamelessly stated he would deploy, if Pratt anf Hilton got too far ahead?
Listen to Kevin McCarthy, a Californian, explain to Maria B. how much undermining of the will of the people Newscum has done to CA elections since he has been governor - including his "break the glass" scenario that "many people deeply understand and know what to do."
https://''www.foxnews.com/video/6397819921112–
[The who interview is instructive about how Newsom has systematically undermined election integrity in CA since he became governor (and how, by contrast, elections at the time he when he won statewide office were determined by the night of, or day after, election DAY) but the part if this clip where Newsom talks about the break the glass scenario (as if reaching for a fire extinguisher behind the glass case) is at 3:51.
<Hey Gov. Newsom - for those constituents in the state you govern who disagree with you on other elections, please explain how exactly you - who supposedly represents all of them - are going to "break the glass" to make sure their votes are overruled and their voices are silenced? You pulled a Katy Porter who was roundly criticized when she said disdainfully that she doesn't need Republicans to be governor in the state. What happened to representing all the people of a state, not just the 45% who are registered Ds? You, like she, said the quiet part outloud. And you are both wrong, wrong on so many levels.