Bannon and Mike Davis are calling forimmediate arrest and deportationof "birthing women" who are illegal before they give birth to an anchor baby.
This is going to be chaos.
Bannon and Davis are calling for an all out, drop everything, immediate arrest and deportation of every woman who is illegal.
The left is going to go batshit.
Bannon's audience takes him seriously. He is an effective communicator.
He is now saying "They got their open borders. They finally got it."
If the British want air conditioning, they should take a trip to the US to a nice air conditioned hospital and have an anchor baby. It's so simple.
The Birthright decision plays right into "foreign capture".If the US were going to be captured by a secret foreign influence, this is precisely what the Court would decide.
Almost all other countries do not support birthright citizenship in their own countries.
Trump has qued-up a new law to take care of the problem.
Trump’s efforts to reverse birthright citizenship may succeed with or without SCOTUS
Several bills, most notably the Birthright Citizenship Act in 2025, seek to end or sharply restrict automatic birthright citizenship by amending the Immigration and Nationality Act. Will it pass constitutional muster?
Jun 29 2026
…In the event the court rules against Trump, a number of Congressional Republicans have legislation pending that could practically accomplish what a different ruling would have done.
"American citizenship is a priceless privilege that must be protected, not exploited. We must restore integrity to our immigration system, uphold the rule of law, and protect the value of American citizenship for generations to come," Rep. Brian Babin, R-Texas, told Just The News.
Several bills, most notably the Birthright Citizenship Act introduced by Babin and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., one day after Trump's inauguration in 2025 (and similar versions in recent Congresses), seek to end or sharply restrict automatic birthright citizenship by amending the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
These measures would reinterpret the 14th Amendment’s “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” clause to grant citizenship at birth only to children with at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen, national, lawful permanent resident (LPR) residing in the U.S., or an LPR serving in the military.
CIS: 225,000 to 250,000 births to illegal immigrants occurred in 2023
The exploitation of U.S. birthright citizenship through “anchor babies” involves pregnant illegal immigrants, predominantly from Latin America, giving birth to children in U.S. territory, and thus, automatically becoming citizens, which may later serve as a basis for family sponsorship or complicate deportation proceedings.
The Center for Immigration Studies estimates 225,000 to 250,000 births to illegal immigrants occurred in 2023—nearly 7 percent of total U.S. births — with the large majority involving parents from Mexico and Central America who, in the aggregate, account for roughly 68 percent of the unauthorized population.
While minor U.S.-citizen children cannot sponsor parents until age 21 (per 1976 amendments to immigration law), critics have argued that these births create long-term “anchors” for chain migration and mixed-status households, generating substantial taxpayer costs for education, healthcare and welfare while raising questions about enforcement priorities in families with citizen children.
Estimates suggest millions of U.S.-born children of unauthorized Latin American immigrants now reside in the country.
(and moar…)
https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/trumps-efforts-reverse-birthright-citizenship-can-succeed-or-without-scotus