>>24772996 pb
nice catch!
https://x.com/rawsalerts/status/2071968444308664380
🚨#BREAKING: SCOTUS has ruled that children born in the United States are guaranteed birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment, even if their parents are in the country unlawfully or temporarily.
10:45 AM · Jun 30, 2026
·
155.5K Views
https://x.com/scotus_wire/status/2071966351019725005
🚨 The Supreme Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship to children born in the United States, including those whose parents are in the country unlawfully or only temporarily, striking down President Trump's executive order.
10:37 AM · Jun 30, 2026
·
691.1K Views
TEXT:
(Slip Opimm)
OCTOBER TERM, 2025
Syllabus
NOTE: Whue it feuible, a will be releaæd,
being
this cue, at the opinim is
no
of opinion of the but h" been
by the
of the
S— state Timber & co.. 200 LL 321, 337
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Syllabus
TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.
BARBARA ET AL
CERTIORARI BEFORE JUDGMENT TO THE UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 25—365. Argued April I, 2026—Decided June 30, 2026
The question presented is whether the Constitution guarantees citizen-
ship to children born in the United States of parents who are unlaw-
fully or temporarily present in the country Under the Citizenship
Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, "[a]ll persons born or natural-
ized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are
citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." On
January 20, 2025, President Trump Issued Executive Order Nc 14160,
titled Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship. The
Order provides that children born in the United States of parents who
are unlawfully or temporarily present here are not "subject to the ju-
risdiction" of the United States—and thus do not qualify for citizenship
under the Fourteenth Am endmen t or the Immigra tron and Nationality
Act (INA), which uses the same language. 90 Fed. Reg_ 8449. Several
parents filed suit, some in the name of their children, arguing that the
Executive Order violates the Fourteenth Amendment and the INA.
The District Court agreed, provisionallv certified a nationwide class of
children who would be denied citizenship by the Order, and prelimi-
narily enjoined the Order's enforcement. This Court granted certiorari
before judgment.
Held: Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or tem-
porarily present are "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States
and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizen-
ship Clause. Pp. 2—26.
(a) The Citizenship Clause must be understood in light of its histor-
ical context, from the English common law to the widespread condem-
nation of the Court's decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393.