most likely explanation!
but what if they don't have insurance? If it's paid for then they probably would not.
more instant Israeli billionaires.
'They did it all on their own with no help at all'
Does the comment about their 'childhood hardship' mean that their super wealthy relatives made the mom go on welfare so the kids would get free everything?
a hundred and 50 year old church is probably best demolished and rebuilt instead of being upgraded unless it's been maintained the whole time.
plus all the 'go-fund-me' sympathy will probably give them a wind fall with which to rebuild.
who are obcessed with having authority over others?
Nepo-baby marxists from over seas who just came to America?
Trump shouldn't have done it and stuck to the points that Canada did not negotiate in good faith. The hate-trump people now have one more reason to ignore the real story.
sometimes there are congregations with very few parishioners. People figure out if they have valuable assets, swoop in, and take over the governance. Then they drive everyone else out of the place and sell it all off and split the money between themselves. I heard this about some Jewish congregations in downtowns of major cities. Also about the Swedenborgians.
do you have sauce for this? you're the 'obsessed with the letter of the constitution' shill who wants to overturn the rule of law, right?
your tired narrative is best filtered.
'he's violating my rights by telling me not to stand on the railroad track'
"I know that it's a semi truck and I'm on a moped, but I had the right of way!" yes but now your dead and he's being cleared of charges because you zoomed right up next to him while he was turning.
you have no sauce for your fowl constant narrative so I will filter you now.
no one is going to pay attention to the renaming of Lake Ontario, anon. It's a stupid idea and done just to tweek the Canadian dicatator.
and not talking about how the Canadian dictatorship did not negotiate in good faith.
The rewriting of textbooks to conform to the marxist's false narratives started happening in the 1980's, anon.
isn't it his first amendment right to say that? Who's the one who doesn't respect free speech now. (you?)
He's not a pull toy puppet who says what YOU want him to say.
you lost the argument when you decided that police don't have free speech rights too.
and so you turn to insults.
you have a video that might just be actors.
second: you say 'commited' and not 'alledgedly commited' so you are perhaps guilty of slander.
you don't care about law you care about slandering the police. I've indulged your temper tantrum long enough. I'll really do it now:FILTERED
could be that 'alternative pork' thing that we've heard so much about . . . in the past.
'cuddlefish'