More careful observation will reveal that vati and Angry Inch the resident mimic are two different schizos
Vati is still butthurt his obsession isn't shared by anons. He had dedicated breads, nobody came over, so he starting trying to fill General breads with his stuff. He got warned, yet persisted, thus his dedicated bread (up to #7 iirc) got nuked and now BVs just delete him. I vaguely recall three occasions his stuff may have contributed but being vati the posts got nuked. Chance at hero but back to zero thing
Vati has a Mini-Me, the schizo from Alberta that uses "keebeck" and is really obsessed with Jesuits
Angry Inch is desperate for attention, any response that gives it a (You) is what it lives for, no matter what the response contains
The muh joo and muh mason keep going with their worn out scripts, sometimes slightly reworded, and every so many months they get some new images
The "AI Warfare/MAGA Patriots" stuff has toned down quite a bit, from what I've seen it's not the original fedboi poster but somebody using the old stuff to play the distract and disrupt game
There's also "smart dust" and the "tooth implant" ones that just want to waste bread
Some breads are slow, some zoom. It all depends on events and how many anons are around at the time. Graveyard shift is not exactly known for going fast like rally breads
I've seen many times the complaints about bread speed. One of the shill's favorite tactics is to get breads to go fast and bury the good stuff. The Previously Collected" is rarely looked at when coming into QR so if the shills can start arguments, stage arguments, or anything to get a bread into the Previously Collected or the archives memory holes helps them
Timesofisrael in the Notables again?
Iran war reshapes Brics ties but also exposes divisions
Azadeh Moshiri South Asia Correspondent, Delhi 8 hours ago
This weekend, some of the most powerful people in the world gathered in Delhi around a vast circular table.
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced that together, the leaders next to him should increasingly become "rule-shapers", not "rule-takers".
Among those listening were members of the Brics group, including Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, Abu Dhabi's Crown Prince Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.
These are hardly natural allies. They have histories of border disputes and even military confrontations.
India and China engaged in a deadly clash along their disputed border in 2020. Iran and the UAE have been on opposing ends of the war in the Middle East, with Tehran launching missiles and drones at its fellow Brics member as the conflict sent shockwaves across global economies.
The fact that India was able to gather these leaders together in person is a feat in and of itself and testament to its diplomatic reach. The weekend also provided a platform for countries to reassess their relationships in light of the Iran war.
But agreeing on what a new global order should look like and achieving clear, tangible outcomes was a much harder task, and that tension ran through this weekend's summit.
A counterweight to Western influence
For members such as China, Russia and Iran, Brics offers a vehicle to dilute the influence of the US and western Europe.
But India has been reluctant to cast Brics as an anti-Western bloc. Modi himself said at the summit that the group is "not against anyone".
That distinction matters for Delhi, which wants to preserve its relationships with nations at odds with each other.
"There are countries in the grouping which would like it to become anti-western, but it is not that," says Anil Trigunayat, a veteran Indian diplomat and former ambassador. What India has achieved, in his view, is a push for "strategic autonomy in an era of war" and initiatives to "enhance greater collaboration amongst themselves".
Inside the joint declaration
The summit succeeded in delivering a joint declaration when divisions among members have rarely been so glaring.
Twice earlier this year, meetings between Brics ministers had failed to produce a joint statement. This time a consensus was reached, but by side-stepping issues that members sharply disagree on, with few solutions.
The "New Delhi Declaration" was adopted on the first day of the summit. But what is striking is what it doesn't say.
On the war in the Middle East, the declaration urges "maximum restraint". It also condemns "attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities" but assigns no blame.
It reiterates support for a two-state solution, opposes forced displacement of Palestinians or actions that could "legitimise or prolong occupation", framing it carefully around existing UN resolutions.
It makes no mention at all of Russia's war in Ukraine, a departure from previous Brics declarations.
There is similar caution on trade. It lists concerns over "indiscriminate rising tariffs" and condemns unilateral sanctions but stops short of naming the US, and is likely to avoid Washington's ire.
Beyond the summit
In the wake of Trump's trade threats and the shock of the war in the Middle East, reshaping the global order has become a vital need for many member economies.
What the summit did provide is a platform for meetings that seemed hard to imagine just a few months ago.
Iran's Pezeshkian and Abu Dhabi's Crown Prince sat down for talks together - the highest-level face-to-face meeting known between the two countries since the war began.
This weekend offered Tehran a chance to show that it does not stand alone amid the US and Israel's military attacks and economic pressure.
As Iran tries to withstand US sanctions, Washington's "Operation Economic Outcast" and a naval blockade on its ports, Pezeshkian pressed for deeper economic ties with Brics members, including Malaysia, India and Ethiopia.
As for China, this was President Xi's first visit to Delhi in seven years. There has been deep mistrust between China and India since the 2020 border dispute, but those tensions have eased. There is also a large trade imbalance, with a deficit tilting heavily in China's favour.
What comes next?
The summit showed that Brics can create space for rivals to talk and manoeuvre outside Western-dominated institutions.
The harder question is what happens next. It's clear that members agree they need a new global order more than ever, but what exactly should replace it and how to get there is far more challenging to answer.
More:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce8767g4jdpo
UK #52
US embassy child abuse images suspect flown from UK before police interview
Vinny McAviney BBC Correspondent 13 September 2026
A US embassy staffer accused of possessing indecent images of children, was detained at his south London flat and flown out of the UK in August, without being first questioned by British police.
The US Embassy confirmed to the BBC that authorities are investigating the allegations and they have reassigned the staff member to the US while inquiries continue.
"The United States government expects all personnel to adhere to the highest standards of conduct, and we take these allegations seriously," embassy officials said in a statement.
They added that they "quickly informed UK law enforcement and took swift action."
It is understood the individual worked at the US embassy in Vauxhall, south west London, and though not a diplomat, he enjoyed the umbrella of diplomatic protection.
He was flown back to the United States on a commercial flight, but their investigations are ongoing in conjunction with UK authorities.
It is also understood Home Office ministers and the Metropolitan Police are in close contact with the US embassy on this matter as investigations continue.
A UK government spokesperson said: "We expect all foreign diplomats in the UK to abide by our laws, in the same way we expect all UK diplomats to do so when posted overseas."
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gjw1j1eq7o
They stole it from Nostradamus