Any anons have feedback on Jovan Pulitzer?

I don't like his delivery and 50% of what he says makes me question his agenda.

In this presentation he scares with China, and laments scare casters in the set up, for example.

I find the difficulty of the subject always circle back to government and lies, how can the American people trust anything the Government says?

Mistrust of government is at an all time high, and nothing seems to be improving that.

The HARD FACTS About Data Centers and Artificial Intelligence! The Good, The Bad and The Ugly!

https://rumble.com/v7fpata-the-hard-facts-about-data-centers-and-artificial-intelligence-the-good-the-.html

>>25054556

What is meant by three names?

I have a first name, a middle name, and a last name.

Am I a evil satanic hollywoodite, because of my birth certificate?

What mechanisms are in place to mandate data centers manufacture their own power?

In the United States, there is no nationwide rule requiring data centers to manufacture or generate all of their own electricity. Instead, several regulatory mechanisms can push—or, in some jurisdictions, require—large data centers to provide new power capacity or pay the full cost of serving them.

“Bring your own power” or “bring your own generation” laws: Some states have proposed or enacted rules requiring data centers to build or procure generation roughly equivalent to their added demand. The supply may be onsite, nearby, or grid-connected, depending on the law. Texas enacted measures in 2025 involving both new generation and demand-response obligations.

Large-load tariffs: Public utility commissions can create special electricity rates for data centers. These may require long-term contracts, minimum payments, or reimbursement for transmission, distribution, and generation upgrades, preventing ordinary customers from subsidizing expansion.

Interconnection and permitting requirements: If a data center builds a power plant, it must generally obtain air-quality, noise, zoning, environmental, and—if grid-connected—utility or FERC approvals. Onsite generation does not eliminate those requirements.

Demand-response and curtailment rules: Regulators may require data centers to reduce consumption during grid stress, switch to permitted onsite generators, or accept being disconnected before residential customers during shortages. These obligations can substitute for, or supplement, self-generation.

Clean-energy procurement mandates: Some proposals require data centers to procure new carbon-free generation or storage equivalent to their load, rather than simply buying renewable-energy credits or using existing grid capacity. This is often called “bring your own new clean energy.”

Cost-allocation rules: States can require developers to fund a specified share of new power plants and grid infrastructure. For example, some state policies have required data centers to cover substantial portions of new transmission and generation costs over multiyear periods.

Incentives rather than mandates: Federal programs generally support onsite clean energy, storage, efficiency, and demand flexibility through technical assistance, loans, tax incentives, and grants; they do not generally compel private data centers to generate their own power.

The practical distinction is important: “manufacture their own power” could mean onsite generation, or it could mean bringing equivalent new generation to the grid. Most policy proposals use the broader second approach. It allows a data center to contract for a new solar, wind, nuclear, gas, geothermal, or storage project elsewhere rather than operating its own power plant.

https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R49326.html

https://www.evergreenaction.com/policy-hub/how-states-can-address-high-costs-from-data-centers-with-byo-clean-energy-requirements/

https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/doe-directs-ferc-accelerate-interconnection-data-centers

>>25054658

>If you were truly curious, you would watch the video and not be asking this.

Currently engaged in another more relevant video.

Read the generalization of 3 names, and thought how does that apply to me.

Since you cannot summarize, you wasted your time to insult, non problem.

I will put it on the list , it will be pretty low though.

As I know my 3 names do not indicate anything about me, more than family and tradition.

Have a good day anon.

>>25054781

>Stop talking about Epstein, you fucking losers.

The reason they need you to stop talking about Epstein.

They sold release the files, as if it meant accountability.

Their can be no accountability, because the deal cut to Epstein,

included zero prosecution of others named.

It exposes the corruption of DOJ and National Security cover of government collusion.

Any of the named individuals could hurt the government through exposure.

Mutual destruction controls the accountability, so the administration tried to get past it.

>>25054818

Extreme Algorithmic Data Miner Storage System

E.A.D.M.S.S.

>>25054894

>SATAN (surveillance and totalitarian authority network)

Given many of the names of the companies involved and the Vatican telescope.

Probably the name assigned for post development and implementation.

Very good anon.

>>25054916

>Never left. You have more than you know.

Jesus and his brother Lucifer, both have dominion over this world?

I thought Jesus acknowledged Lucifer's dominion, during his 40 days in the desert.

Are you implying the bible is not God's word?

That more relevant truth is to be found elsewhere?

>>25054937

Is God mentioned in the US constitution?

No. The text of the U.S. Constitution does not mention “God,” “Creator,” or “Almighty.”

It does address religion in two important places:

Article VI: prohibits religious tests for federal office.

First Amendment: prevents Congress from establishing a religion or prohibiting its free exercise.

The Declaration of Independence, a separate founding document, does mention a “Creator” and “Nature’s God.”

https://constitutioncenter.org/

https://www.uscourts.gov/

https://www.archives.gov/

>>25054937

>believes the Constitution affirms rights that are God-given is now an"Anti-American"cop hater

Rights provided by our constitution, bill of rights, makes cops detestable to freedom lovers, as they enforce policies and codes, not Laws.

Much of our system is the individual giving up their rights, like signing up for a drivers license subjects you to codes, that betray the constitution and it's dictates.

You will find the Creator, rights, and rules for remedy in the declaration of independence.

"That to secure these rights, governments are instituted amongst Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,_ That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government……

Notice the right to alter government is the people, not the government.

We the people are looking for remedies in all the wrong places.

>>25055042

>The original U.S. Constitution (ratified first by nine, then by all thirteen states) closes with the mention of God as “Lord.”

“The year of our Lord” is the English translation of the Latin phrase Anno Domini (A.D.), meaning “in the year of the Lord.” It refers to the traditional Christian calendar, counting years from the traditionally estimated birth of Jesus Christ.

For example:

A.D. 2026 means “in the year of our Lord 2026.”

2026 C.E. (“Common Era”) is the secular-neutral equivalent and uses the same numbering.

In legal or historical documents, the phrase usually identifies the calendar system being used; its presence does not necessarily mean the document is establishing Christianity as a state religion.

Lord can also mean Baal.

>God Is Mentioned In the Constitution and the Declaration.

No God is not mentioned in the Constitution.

You can choose to believe the God of your choice, hence freedom of religion, ambiguous wording was for such purposes.

Even creator can mean different God's in different belief systems (religions).

The problem arises when you claim your God, inferring all others have no right.

>>25055090

>THIS WAS DONE FOR A REASON.

Possibly to kill 1/3 of the population.

It sure in hell is not bringing people together, just further division.

Of course lies and false narratives from government, and all sectors of the world.

>>25055116

Baal and Lord are related words in meaning, but they usually refer to different beings in the Bible.

Baal is a Hebrew word meaning “lord,” “master,” “owner,” or “husband.” It became the name of a major Canaanite god, associated especially with storms, rain, and fertility.

Lord is the English translation of several Hebrew and Greek words, especially Adonai in Hebrew and Kyrios in Greek. In the Bible, “the Lord” usually refers to the God of Israel.

Baal is mentioned in passages such as:

Numbers 25:1–9 — worship of Baal of Peor

Judges 2:11–13 — Israel worships the Baals

1 Kings 16:30–33 — King Ahab promotes Baal worship

1 Kings 18:20–40 — Elijah confronts the prophets of Baal on Mount Carmel

Hosea 2:16–17 — God tells Israel not to call Him “Baal”

The central contrast is stated in 1 Kings 18:21: Elijah asks Israel whether they will follow the LORD or Baal. Although baal can literally mean “lord,” Baal is the name of a false/Canaanite god, while the LORD refers to Israel’s God, whose Hebrew name is YHWH.

So:

Baal = “lord/master,” later the name of a Canaanite deity

Adonai/the LORD = the Lord God of Israel

>>25055134

>>25055134

>>lies and false narratives

comports with biblical prophecy

The prophecy about one-third being killed is primarily in Revelation 9.

In John’s vision, four angels are released at the Euphrates, and a massive mounted army kills one-third of humanity. The stated means are fire, smoke, and sulfur coming from the horses’ mouths:

Revelation 9:15 — the four angels are prepared for the appointed time.

Revelation 9:18 — “a third of mankind was killed” by the three plagues.

Revelation 9:20–21 — the survivors still do not repent of idolatry, murders, sorceries, sexual immorality, and thefts.

Other “one-third” judgments appear in Revelation 8, where one-third of the earth, trees, sea creatures, ships, rivers, and the heavenly lights are affected. These are different events from the one-third of humanity killed in Revelation 9.

A related passage is Zechariah 13:8–9, where two-thirds are cut off and one-third remains to be refined and tested. That passage says the remaining third will call on God; it is not the same wording or scene as Revelation 9.

>>25055135

>>25055116

>>25055099

>>25055137

>Only the Pharisee take the Bible literally. Good grief.

The discussion was for the purpose of freedom of religion, no God mentioned in the Constitution, and the purpose of ambiguity in language.

>>25055160

>Judah is Leo

Yes—Judah is compared to a lion in the Bible, but the exact wording is “Judah is a lion’s cub” or “a lion’s whelp.”

In Genesis 49:9–10, Jacob prophesies about his son Judah:

“Judah is a lion’s cub… The scepter shall not depart from Judah…”

The lion represents:

strength and victory

kingship and authority

Judah’s ruling tribe

the royal line of David

This prophecy is connected to Jesus in Revelation 5:5, where He is called:

“the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David.”

Revelation then shows something important: John hears about a Lion, but sees a Lamb—Jesus is both the victorious King and the sacrificial Lamb.

So the biblical connection is:

Judah → lion → royal line of David → Jesus, the Lion of Judah.