Anonymous ID: 0964a4 Sept. 19, 2026, 8:35 p.m. No.25056335   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>25051856 /lpb

>40 YEARS - without a new refinery isn’t a market failure. It’s sabotage — and they’re riding diesel straight into November. Diesel prices. AI hysteria. Ukraine and the Mideast. A hostile Fed. Nobody is connecting them — so on Thursday we did. These are not separate crises. They are one operation

 

What if…

We know the A.I. screeching isn't about what it claims to be, but maybe it's not about control either. Maaaaybe, it's a trigger to signal timing to a counterparty to take action and/or false weakness to the enemy to pull the trigger on raising the diesel prices. Need "new CATs" because they eat so much diesel to finish the datacenter buildout…or they're finished and ready on time and under budget for primetime.

Anonymous ID: 0964a4 Sept. 19, 2026, 9:54 p.m. No.25056496   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6502

>>25056342

The accompanying image is a radio waterfall/spectrogram from the High Frequency Global Communications System (HFGCS) on or near the primary frequency 11.175 MHz, timestamped 2026.09.19 21:35:37 UTC

 

Do they use 11.3 or 11.5 MHz?

Anonymous ID: 0964a4 Sept. 19, 2026, 9:57 p.m. No.25056502   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6511

>>25056496

>Do they use 11.3 or 11.5 MHz?

 

Standard HFGCS primary voice frequencies

The High Frequency Global Communications System (HFGCS) uses these core USB frequencies for EAMs, Skyking messages, and general air-ground traffic:

 

4724 kHz (4.724 MHz) — primary nighttime

8992 kHz (8.992 MHz)

11175 kHz (11.175 MHz) — primary daytime / most commonly monitored

15016 kHz (15.016 MHz)

 

Additional secondary or discrete frequencies exist (e.g., 6739, 13200 kHz and various others), but the four listed above are the published primaries that carry the bulk of the simulcast EAM traffic. Messages are often transmitted on multiple (or all) of these frequencies simultaneously for reliability.

https://www.sigidwiki.com/wiki/HFGCS_(High_Frequency_Global_Communications_System)

Anonymous ID: 0964a4 Sept. 20, 2026, 12:16 a.m. No.25056680   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/19/denmark-says-binding-us-deal-on-greenland-wont-compromise-sovereignty

 

If you can't defend yourself, you're not sovereign…welcome to the party, Greenland!

Anonymous ID: 0964a4 Sept. 20, 2026, 2:24 a.m. No.25056827   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Results from an inquiry:

 

Integrated summary of the private closed-source AI market concentration and public-market protection

 

### Market Concentration (70–90% of private foundation-model capital and value)

OpenAI, Anthropic, and (to a lesser extent) xAI account for the overwhelming majority of the private closed-source / foundation-model market. In Q1 2026 they captured ~85% of foundation-model lab funding (up from ~70% in full-year 2025).

 

Approximate latest reported private valuations:

  • Anthropic ~$965B (May 2026 Series H)

  • OpenAI ~$852B (March 2026 round)

  • xAI ~$200–230B

 

Together these three represent the bulk of private frontier AI value and capital. Smaller closed/semi-closed players (Cohere, Mistral, etc.) make up the remainder.

 

### Primary investors who lose if they fail

Corporate/strategic

  • Microsoft (largest external OpenAI shareholder, historically ~27% economic interest / ~$13B+ invested; also holds Anthropic stake; deep Azure ties)

  • Amazon (large stakes and cloud/Trainium commitments in both OpenAI and Anthropic)

  • SoftBank (tens of billions in late-stage OpenAI commitments)

  • Nvidia (equity + chip demand across the three)

  • Google/Alphabet (multi-billion Anthropic stake + cloud)

 

Venture/growth/hedge funds

Thrive Capital, Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Coatue, Altimeter, Dragoneer, ICONIQ, Greenoaks, Founders Fund, Khosla Ventures, and overlapping multi-strategy funds.

 

Sovereigns and institutions

MGX, GIC, Temasek, Qatar Investment Authority, plus BlackRock/Blackstone/Fidelity/T. Rowe/TPG-affiliated vehicles.

 

xAI-specific

Elon Musk, Tesla, Valor Equity Partners, Fidelity, QIA, MGX, Nvidia.

 

Employee equity and the OpenAI Foundation also hold significant stakes. Direct equity losses would be measured in tens to low hundreds of billions of dollars of private mark-to-market value, concentrated among the parties above. Circular compute/chip deals would amplify commercial revenue pressure on the same strategics.

 

### Protection for the general public and public markets

High direct protection

The labs remain private. Ordinary retail investors, 401(k)s, and broad index funds have essentially zero direct equity ownership. Limited retail access exists only through narrow vehicles (certain ARK funds, Fundrise, AngelList USVC, Robinhood Ventures, a few active ETFs with tiny pre-IPO stakes). These are small in absolute terms and held by investors who knowingly accepted private-market risk.

 

Indirect public-market exposure remains real

  • Public companies that are major investors and partners (Microsoft, Amazon, Nvidia, Alphabet) would face equity write-downs of their stakes plus reduced cloud/chip demand.

  • Infrastructure spending (data centers, GPUs) priced into public markets at high growth rates would slow, pressuring Nvidia, the hyperscalers, and related names.

  • Broad AI-sector sentiment and tech valuations (especially Magnificent 7 / Nasdaq) would likely re-rate.

  • Future IPOs could transfer remaining risk into public indices and retail portfolios.

 

Overall

Retail and ordinary public-market portfolios are well insulated from direct equity wipeouts. Public markets would still experience diluted but meaningful second-order effects through the large public tech names and infrastructure demand, without the full systemic force of a broadly held public-company failure.