>>2519785 lb
No anon, not new. I'm well aware of their tactics. Now we have 3 clowns pushing it. Heavy flack.
>>2519785 lb
No anon, not new. I'm well aware of their tactics. Now we have 3 clowns pushing it. Heavy flack.
TY Baker
hahahahahahaha
are you really that stoooopid???
You are accusing someone of being a pedo without any shred of proof and you want me to sauce it??? SMDH
Sounds like an innocent man died from false allegations.
Not without sauce.
She's not credible. They've been pushing her on us for 3 days now, trying to discredit us by accusing franklin Graham of pedophilia.
No, I don't think he was. It would have come out. I'm not saying he is sinless, but I don't buy into pedophilia. And certainly don't buy it about Franklin.
Yep. Not even a good photoshop.
ThanQ anon. That hits the spot.
hahahaha
using Russia tactics against anons isn't going to work faggot. We deal in facts and truths. Prove what she is claiming is true or get the fuck out.
Show your proof or STFU.
Nope. Not going in notables. That's only for sauce digs. It's already been researched and debunked. It's a shill slide looking to discredit us.
We have no idea why Potus did not speak at his funeral. To assume that it had anything to do with him being a pedo is a huge stretch. In this country, we are afforded the right to be innocent until proven guilty, or have you forgotten about that?
You notice all they have for "proof" is the fucking national enquirer? The biggest rag mag of all time.
IP Hopping again?
Wait, you mean this one? The one Cully supports?????
Go away clown. Ain't going to work tonight anymore than it did last night or the night before.
Where do you think Jesus went to preach? In the synagogue's?
I have seen nothing about her recent tweets that is even close to credible. Wild allegations mean nothing without some sort of proof, which she does not have. If these clowns want to be believed, then bring some fucking proof!!!! How hard is that to understand?
Secondly, you mention her being politically proactive. That 's a red flag. Who is she targeting? Potus supporters, that's who.
Using a poorly photoshopped newspaper article from years ago and national enquirer as the only sauces proves this is nothing but an attempt to discredit this board.
Do you believe the women who claimed Potus abused them?
where is your proof about Billy or Franklin?
you stupid clowns failed bigly. Go back to your mommies basement now and let the adults talk.
I second for notables
what I thought. Absolutely no proof.
No argument from me. It shut them up last time I posted it too.
Nope, you're wrong. That's not how it works in this country. Try harder faggot. She has not even filed a police report, idiot. And you want to keep pushing that she should be believed? Get out!
> I'm not about crucifying people over old accusations that never had a lick of action taken against them.
EXACTLY
Making claims without actual proof like a police report is just bs allegations. How many times has good men's lives been ruined by a woman making false allegations? There is no one shred of evidence to back up her claims. Without it, there is no reason to believe she is credible. If what she claimed was true, she would have filed a police report and pressed charges. That was never done.
This is not some fucking third world country were you must prove your innocence. This republic is governed by the rule of law. EVERY PERSON IN THIS COUNTRY IS INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY IN A COURT OF LAW.
I think you are probably right. I give Potus the benefit of the doubt just like I do Billy and Franklin.
NOT FUCKING NOTABLE
We deal in facts, not innuendo, shill. Take it back to twatter, faggot
make me faggot