>>2529353 (lb)
Lesson about jewish ingrained racist and bigotry
Did you know goyim means both non-jew and cattle?
And that the word for non-jewish woman is shiksa, which means something dirty and abominable?
Reminder that like islam, judaism is going to be banned from the West soon enough due to it being a supremacist ideological threat to the Western Christian culture
Hear it from a candid jew in video related 1.
Jewish ideological supremacism has ALWAYS been the psychological motivation for their group misbehavior as a people, which in turn has made them systematic targets (of well deserved (virtually every single time it happened)) of persecution has a people since the times of Abraham. See pics related 1 and 2.
Jews have always had a double standard on how they treat the goyim (word for non-jew AND cattle) compared to other fellow jews since the beginning of their history as a (ideologically supremacist) people. See the example on pic related 2. This phenomena is still pretty much alive today as we can verify when we look into the subject of jewish nepotism (nepotism which desingenious jews try to hide from the more gullible goyim/cattle with the verifiable and easily debunked myth of "jews have higher IQ than gentiles that's why they are so successful"). Pics related 3 and 4.
>Important notes:
First of all, what is a jew?
1)
A person who is of the jewish race (although many racial jews reject judaism); or
2)
A person who embraces judaism (although many religious jews are not racially jews).
>Invididuals, groups and ideologies:
Does the information above make every every muslim or religious jew a bad person? No.
Does the fact that there exist good people who are muslims or religious jews makes judaism or islam less of an ideological threat to Western civilization (Christian Western culture)? No.
>Reconcile:
There will come a time in the near future where every muslim and religious jew (be it a racial jew or non-jew) living in the West will have to choose between keep supporting an ideology which promotes supremacism and genital mutilation, or living in the West.
If they prefer being a religious jew or muslim better than supporting a sustainably safe and stable West, then great for them, GTFO of the West then.
>For those that might be thinking: “Hey, Q said this is not about religion”:
Q also said this is not about race, but is it not true that Trump put in place several travel bans from certain countries whose population is too low IQ and its culture incompatible with the Western civilization in order to protect the US?
In the same spirit, the banning of islam and judaism due to them both being supremacist ideologies which threaten the West is not about banning these “religions” just because, its about protecting Western nations against specific and FACTUAL threats (in this case, two supremacist ideologies that are incompatible with Western Christian values), just like having border controls and putting in place certain travel bans is not about banning people from entry just because, but it is about protecting the Western nations against specific and FACTUAL threats.
>A suggestion:
I suggest each and every person to read the chapter “2 - THE CAUSES OF HOSTILITY TOWARDS JEWS: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW” of the book “When Victims Rule: A Critique of Jewish Pre-eminence in America”. Link here: https://archive.is/1IEWq
This will give you verifiable and FACTUAL information about jewish history, religion and culture so you can see the fraud behind the narrative constantly pushed by jewish controlled media and MSM that jews as a group have always been innocent victims of unjust persecution, which is FALSE, and as you’ll learn they were always at odds with the goyim/cattle because judaism was ALWAYS a supremacist ideology since its inception, and they were involved in lots of violent conflict, among each other and their goyim/cattle neighbors. It will also teach you some interesting facts about the Talmud, so go read it and read it all as soon as you can: https://archive.is/1IEWq
Let us now learn a little about jewish culture and history so you can understand why judaism IS a supremacist ideology
From the book “When Victims Rule” (link to book: https://archive.is/1IEWq ):
“ In order to understand the present and prospects for the future, something must be understood about the past. Jews claim their origins to a seminal patriarch, Abraham, in the land of Ur (today part of Iraq) 4,000 years ago. Abraham was not a farmer or village member of a settled community. He was likely one of the "wandering" tribes of his time, a citizenship less, "outsider" social class known as the "Apiru," or "Habiru" (Hebrews) who were scattered across a wide area of the Middle East, from Syria to Egypt. [ANDERSON, p. 33] According to traditional Jewish religious belief, God is reputed to have singled out 75-year old Abraham among all people on earth and struck an arrangement with him, providing his progeny the consummate family inheritance: "If Abraham will follow the commandments of God, then He, in His turn, will make the descendants of Abraham His Chosen People and place them under His protection … God at this time stipulates only one commandment, and makes only one promise." [DIMONT, p. 29] The initial agreement, by modern standards, seems extraordinarily peculiar. God's commandment was that all males by the eighth day of birth must have the foreskin of their penises cut off, a painfully literal branding of Jewish distinction around the male procreative organ:
"God … said to Abraham … You shall circumcise the flesh of
the foreskin and that shall be the Covenant between Me
and you." GENESIS: 17:9-13
With this physical marking, notes Barnet Litvinoff, “no male child born of Jewish parentage is ever allowed to forget he is a Jew … it reminds him of the doctrine of the chosen people.” [LITVINOFF, p. 5] "As a sign of this sacred bond, of being special seed, Chosen," note Herbert Russcol and Margarlit Banai, "The Lord of the Universe commands Abraham" to circumcize "every man child among you." And as the Torah states it: "I will establish my covenant between Me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant." [RUSSCOL/BANAI, 1970, p. 173] Is this alleged commandment by God to the Abrahamic "seed" in Jewish tradition not racial?
"Circumcision," says Lawrence Hoffman, "has thus remained the sine qua non of Jewish identity throughout time. Jews came to believe that it warded off danger, and even saved Jews from damnation, that the sign of circumcision was tantamount to carrying God's ineffable name carved in the flesh, that it was a means of attaining mystical unity with the creator, and that it brought about visionary experience." [HOFFMAN, p. 11] It also symbolized, on the male genitals, special attention to the genetic continuance of the progeny of Abraham, that – if they obeyed the laws and demands of God – they would someday be as "numerous as the stars.""
–
>Problems with the above facts:
1)
Circumcision is scientifically proven to cause permanent brain damage in children (pic related 1);
2)
Its a form of non-consentual religious branding;
3)
Its a barbaric form of child abuse via male genital mutilation; and
4)
The first reason it is done in the first place is to remind the jewish children that they are "God's chosen", which incites the jews to adopt a supremacist mindset toward the goyim/catle, who according to judaism are implicitly inferior due to not being jews, and thus, not part of the ones who were "chosen by God".
Important note
1)
For those that say that ”most science today is fraud”, in order to implicitly downplay the relevance of the studies about circumcision causing permanent brain damage in children I say this:
Go grab the test I am referring to and disprove it using the scientific method then if you want to solidify what you're trying to imply.
Extreme pain in children scars alters their brain structure (aka: brain damage), circumcision does that to children.
2)
For those that say that “As a very acomplished person, I see no problem with the process of circumcision because I am a very acomplished person”, I say this:
Doesn't mean the damage isn't there.
Doens't make the process of circumcision any less barbaric.
Doesn't make judaism any less of an idological threat to the West.
>Also:
You could just be lying. Try to not use anecdotes next time, try to use verifiable facts :)
Not only IS judaism a supremacist ideology, it is a also a verifiable FACT that jews always persecuted Christians since the inception of Christianity. Judaism IS incompatible with the Western Christian value based civilization, and that too is a verifiable FACT.
From the book “When Victims Rule”, chapter “3 - JEWS AND CHRISTIANITY”:
“During the turbulent times of the Middle Ages and leading to our own era, there have been a number of wars with particularly religious emphasis. From 1208 to 1228, for instance, the Catholic Church led crusades against the Albigensions (a Christian "heretic" movement in Western Europe), which totally destroyed them. The Inquisition burned thousands of Christians at the stake and eliminated religious dissent in Southern Europe. For over a century, from 1559, much of Europe echoed a series of religious wars between Catholics and Protestants. One of the most famous atrocities of this period was the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre, in which thousands of Huguenots were massacred in Paris, and thousands more in the countryside. In the seventeenth century, Protestant churches in Poland were destroyed by Catholics in anti-Protestant riots in towns like Poznan, Cracow, and Lublin. [HAGEN, p. 198]
Within this context of intra-religious warring, in conjunction with famines, pestilence, and other wide-spread catastrophes, "what is astonishing," writes Alan Edelstein, "given the situation of medieval European Jewry, and what bears examination, is not that many were attacked, expelled, or forcibly converted, but that more were not." [EDELSTEIN]”
>Note:
It is well documented that jews were not as persecuted by Christians in medieval times as they might want to have you believe.
Lets keep reading from the book “When Victims Rule”, chapter “3 - JEWS AND CHRISTIANITY”:
“"Any judgment on the Christian treatment of Jews [across history]," agrees Nicholas de Lange, another Jewish scholar, "should also take account of the treatment of other religions, and indeed of dissident movements within Christianity. Against this background, the treatment of Jews can actually seem astonishingly humane and generous." [DE LANGE, p. 35] "Christianity mercilessly persecuted paganism and heresies," says Abram Leon," [but] it tolerated the Jewish religion." [LEON, p. 73] "We shall have to admit," wrote famed Jewish historian Salo Baron, "that church censorship has rarely interfered with the autonomous development of Jewish culture." [BARON, Ancient, p. 266]”
>Note:
It is well documented that jews were not targeted by the Church’s censorship, and thus the development of their jewish culture was not interfered with.
Lets keep reading from the book “When Victims Rule”, chapter “3 - JEWS AND CHRISTIANITY”:
“ Yet modern Jewry's deep animosity towards Christianity stems from the accusation that institutional Christianity (as distinct from riotous mobs and individuals) was seminal to anti-Semitism in the Middle Ages, and even earlier, laying a religious foundation for the hostility towards Jews in the Western world to our own time. It can easily be argued, however, (as did Benjamin Disraeli, and others) that official Christian protection of Jewry is as much responsible for Judaism's survival as anything else. "It may be asserted," wrote Salo Baron," that had it not been for the Catholic Church, the Jews would have not survived the Middle Ages in Christian Europe." [SCHORSCH, p. 38] Yet an important part of the Jewish victim tradition is the perceived monolithic oppression of Christianity, presumably emanating from the traditional Christian notion that "Jews killed Jesus," and epitomized in attacks by medieval mobs and thugs against Jews, especially during the fervor of the Crusades in 1068. "Anyone who reads the Talmudic tractate Avodah Zara," says Michael Lerner, "cannot escape the impression that Jews have come to believe that all non-Jews are so dangerous that they should be avoided." [LERNER, Goyim, p. 434]”
1/7
2/7
>Note:
It is well documented that jews would have been destroyed in medieval times if it was not for the Church’s protection of judaism, even if jews as a group keep crying victim in a fraudulent way (which is an ever present pattern of jewish behavior and subversion, to always paint jews as a group as victims, when it is very well documented that they are, as a group, a terrible PLAGUE upon each and every nation that kindly hosts them, as you’ll learn).
Lets keep reading from the book “When Victims Rule”, chapter “3 - JEWS AND CHRISTIANITY”:
“Cecil Roth, a prominent Jewish historian in the first half of this century, argues that the Jewish persecution by Christianity throughout the ages – a staple of popular Jewish folklore – has been greatly exaggerated:
"Jewish historiography towards Christianity, and especially Catholicism, is
typical of the errors which a too slavish following of the German
tradition has inspired … The same lack of understanding and the same
violence of contrast have been carried into other aspects of Jewish
history. No attempt whatsoever has been made to understand the
psychology of persecution. Any Jew-baiter is necessarily represented
as a bloodthirsty desperado … Any [Jewish] apostate as a mere self-
seeking humbug. All persons who have favored the Jews inevitably
figure as saints and heroes, while whoever opposes or oppressed them
automatically become ruffians and hypocrites … Almost every Jew is
made to figure as a peaceful, unoffending saint, with no blemish
whatsoever to mar his character or to explain his mistreatment … [But]
blood ran as quickly in the ghetto as outside … [Jewish] violence was
not unknown in the synagogue itself. [Jewish] sordidness was present in
plenty to enhance by contrast the glories of martyrdom." [ROTH, p.
421-423]”
“ Based upon the ancient Judaic mythos of eternal victimization, Jewish animosity – and often hatred – towards Christianity runs deep to this day. Yet, says Salo Baron, "It would be a mistake … to believe that hatred was the constant keynote of Judeo-Christian relations, even in [medieval] Germany or Italy. It is the nature of historical records to transmit to posterity the memory of extraordinary events, rather than of the ordinary flow of life." [LIBERLES, p. 347]
Judaism had, of course, antipathy for Christianity from the latter's very inception. Christianity evolved out of Judaism; it was founded and propagated by Jews dissatisfied with the direction of the seminal faith as guided by its leaders. "Popular hatred of the Temple priest and the rich," says Lenni Brenner, "became the basis of Christianity, and the New Testament must be seen as the last major production of the Jewish religious genre." [BRENNER, p. 42] The new faith branched out of Judaism as a distinctly different – and to Jewish minds heretical – religious view. At this point in history, Judaism was the dominant religious force (vis a vis Christianity) in Jerusalem; Christianity was embryonic and Jews were the persecutors. Christians hoped that Jews would join their new, universalistic faith.”
>Note:
Notice the typical jewish a group strategic use of painting themselves as a GROUP of victims (even when it is verifiable that said narrative of jews as victims is a LIE). This ever present pattern of jewish GROUP behavior and subversion, to always paint jews as a GROUP of victims, when it is very well documented that they are anything but (as you’ll learn as you read more about jewish hisotry and culture, when jews have been targeted as a group they always were so for very good reasons, such as their bigotry, their violence, their ritual murder of goyim children, their criminal behavior, among other types of behavior that made the goyim hostile toward them).
Keep this in mind when you talk about something and some jew or some jew apologist fells the need to tell you about jews as supposed eternal victims. When faced with that dynamic, I always try to educate those people on FACTUAL jewish history and culture. The narrative of jews as a group of eternal VICTIMS is a WEAPON against the non-jews, makes them more manipulable, it lowers their guard, and it opens their wallets (books, movies, tickets, etc), and most dangerously, makes goyim NOT fight the terrible weapon of jewish subversion and supremacism: “hate-speech” laws, whose purpose is ONLY to censor legitimate criticism of jewish subversion and supremacism.
2/7
3/7
Lets keep reading from the book “When Victims Rule”, chapter “3 - JEWS AND CHRISTIANITY”:
“Edward Flannery writes that
"The synagogue resented Christianity's claims and in the emerging
conflict struck the first blow. Hellenist Jewish converts to the Church
were driven from Jerusalem. [Saint] Stephen was killed, as were the two
Jameses, though James the Less was killed through the action of the high
priest, not the majority of Jews. Peter was forced out of Palestine by the
persecution of Herod Agrippa I, and Paul endured flagellations,
imprisonment, and complaints by Jews to Roman authorities, and threats
of death at Jewish hands. Barnabas' death (60 AD) at the hands of Jews in
Cypress is unanimously reported by early hagiographers." [FLANNERY,
p. 27]
By 80 AD Jewish ritual had incorporated a daily curse against Christians: "May the minim [heretics] perish in an instant; may they be effaced from the book of life and not be counted among the Just." [FLANNERY, p. 28] In 117 CE Jews were involved in the death of St. Simeon, the bishop of Jerusalem, and unrepenting Christians were massacred by Jews in the Bar Kocha revolt (132-135 AD) against the Romans.
Christians were severely persecuted under Roman rule, while Jews – after initial revolts against Rome – largely prospered. "Christians were subject to mounting and systematic persecution from the time of Emperor Trajan (98-117 CE) onwards," notes Robin Spiro, "The Jews, by and large, fared better than the Christians at the hands of the Romans, and retained the majority of their special privileges." [SPIRO, p. 17] As Christianity grew in later centuries, attacks, riots, pogroms, rebellions – or whatever else one chooses to polemically label them – were instigated by Jews against Christians in Palestine and other parts of the Old World. Simon Dubnov notes that "in 556, during bouts in the circus in Caesarea, the Samaritans, assisted by Jewish youths, attacked the Christians. The Christians were beaten soundly. Several churches were razed and Stephanus, the governor of Palestine, was killed … In Antiocha … in 608, the local Jews rebelled; since they predominated in numbers they killed many Christians, including the patriarch Anastasias, whose body they dragged through the city streets … In other localities (Scytopolis, for instance) the Jews were hostile toward the Christians. During commercial transactions, they would not even accept money directly from the hands of a Christian; they had to throw their coins into water, where the Jews would then retrieve them." [DUBNOV, p. 24-25 v. 2]"
3/7
4/7
Lets keep reading from the book “When Victims Rule”, chapter “3 - JEWS AND CHRISTIANITY”:
“When the Persians invaded Palestine in 614, Jews joined as "auxiliaries" in slaughtering Christian neighbors. "Jewish warriors," says Simon Dubnov, "along with Persians, now assaulted numerous Christian churches (a church legend exaggerates the number of dead to 90,000). Many churches, including the one of Christ's grave, were razed to the ground … In hostile acts towards Christians the Jew did not lag behind the Persians. Bitter resentment … found an outlet in atrocities." [DUBNOV, p. 216, v. 2] According to a Christian monk of the times, Strategius of Mar Saba, Jews bought "a large number" of Christian prisoners from the Persians, "who they then slaughtered just as one might buy cattle to slaughter." [SCHAFER, p. 192] "Even as the Persians were approaching Palestine," notes Peter Schafer, "the Jews appear to have risked an open revolt against the Christians and allied themselves with the Persians." [SCHAFER, p. 140] The Persians were soon driven out, however, by Heraclius of Christian Byzantium. When a Jewish leader, Benjamin of Tiberias, was asked why he had previously justified the cruelties against Christians, the Jewish patriot is reported to have answered, "Because they were the enemies of my religion." [DUBNOV, p. 218, v.2]
For centuries a range of ridiculing and hostile defamatory material about Christ was popularly circulated in the Jewish communities, eventually written as Sefar Toledoth Yeshu. "It enjoyed wide circulation among the general Jewish population." [JACOB, W., 1974, p. 11] The earliest known copy found in modern times was discovered in a synagogue built in the seventh century. Christ, it was said, practiced witchcraft and was the illegitimate son of a Roman soldier or, by other accounts, a "disreputable man of the tribe of Judah." [SHAHAK, p. 98, FLANNERY, p. 34, GOLDSTEIN, p. 148] The book, “in Hebrew and Yiddish was, but is not now, in common circulation," wrote Jewish scholar Joseph Klausner in 1926, "yet the book may still be found in (manuscript) and in print among many educated Jews. Our mothers knew its contents by hearsay – of course with all manner of corruptions, charges, omissions, and imaginative additions – and handed them on to their children." [KLAUSNER, p. 48] In the early years of Christianity Rabbi Tarphon of Jerusalem declared that "Christians were worse than heathens and one Rabbi Meir proclaimed that the New Testament was "a revelation of sin." [FLANNERY, p. 34]
The Talmud also accused Jesus of a variety of sexual indiscretions and that he had been condemned by God to boil for eternity in "boiling excrement." Jewish religious texts also enjoined pious Jews to burn whatever New Testament volumes they came across. (Israel Shahak notes that this was publicly performed in Israel in 1980 by a Jewish religious organization, Yad Le'alchim). [SHAHAK, p. 21]”
4/7
5/7
Lets keep reading from the book “When Victims Rule”, chapter “3 - JEWS AND CHRISTIANITY”:
“A Chabad-sponsored Internet web site notes that
"The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of 'Jesus of Nazarene':
1) He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray
into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the
purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).
2) He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned),
was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent
(Sanhedrin 107b, Sotah 47a).
3) He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform miracles, used procedures
that involved cutting his flesh – which is also explicitly banned in the Bible
(Shabbos 104b).
The false, rebellious message of Jesus has been thoroughly rejected by the
vast majority of the Jewish people, as G-d commanded. Unfortunately,
however, this same message has brought a terrible darkness upon the
world; today, over 1.5 billion gentiles believe in Jesus. Those lost souls
mistakingly think they have found salvation in Jesus; tragically, they are
in for a rude awakening." [NOAH'S COVENANT WEB SITE, 2001]
"The very name Jesus," says Shahak, "was for Jews a symbol of all that is abominable, and this popular tradition still exists. The Gospels are equally detested, and they are not allowed to be quoted (let alone taught) even in modern Israel schools. … For theological reasons, mostly rooted in ignorance, Christianity as a religion is classed by rabbinical teaching as idolatry. All Christian emblems and pictorial representations are regarded as idols … " [SHAHAK, p. 98]
Another Israeli, Israel Shamir, notes that the Toledoth is being rejuvenated today in Israel:
"Last year [2000], the biggest Israeli tabloid Yedioth Aharonoth reprinted in its
library the Jewish anti-Gospel, Toledoth Yeshu, compiled in the Middle Ages.
It is the third recent reprint, including one in a newspaper. If the Gospel is the
book of love, Toledoth is the book of hate for Christ. The hero of the book
is Judas. He captures Jesus by polluting his purity. According to Toledoth,
the conception of Christ was in sin, the miracles of Christ were witchcraft,
his resurrection but a trick." [SHAMIR, I., 2001]”
5/7
6/7
Lets keep reading from the book “When Victims Rule”, chapter “3 - JEWS AND CHRISTIANITY”:
“ In 1997, notes Yossi Halevi, "a group of pro-Israel Pentecostals from Oklahoma were gathered outside the room on Jerusalem's Mt. Zion traditionally associated with Jesus' Last Supper, when several Ultra-Orthodox men passing by ostentatiously covered their noses with their prayer shawls, to protect them from the 'stench;' one of them spat on the ground." [HALEVI, Y., p. 16] In Jewish tradition, notes Leon Poliakov, "Christians, significantly, were feared as wild animals much more than hated as men." [WOLFSON, p. 6]
This age-old Jewish contempt is integral to the reciprocal Christian religious animosity towards Jews in the Middle Ages, especially after such material was revealed by Jewish apostates to the surrounding Christian populace. But it is not likely that most "Christian" hostility towards Jews through the ages was based solely upon religious beliefs, although their contesting world view certainly could inflame non-Jewish hostility. As even Mark Twain noted, "With most people, of a necessity, bread and meat take first rank, religion second. I am convinced that the persecution of the Jews is not due in any large degree to religious prejudice." [TWAIN]
At Hebrew classes," says Evelyn Kaye, who was raised in an Orthodox community, "we learned only about the role of the Jews in Greek and Roman times. The other aspects of the world were dismissed completely … At Hebrew classes, we understood that no one ever mentioned the name of Jesus under any circumstances … Any discussion of Jesus was taboo … We learned nothing about the spread of Christianity, or its development. We heard nothing of Christian suffering in defense of faith … I absorbed the idea that as soon as Jesus had arrived and started Christianity, Jews were persecuted ever after." [KAYE, p. 79]
Secular Jewish author Earl Shorris recalled in 1982 the first time he bought a Christmas tree, and the emotions he had when he decided to throw the tree out after both he and his son cut their hands on Christmas ornaments ("one of the cruciform balls"):
"I resolved to save the lives of the Shorris family by getting the Christmas tree
out of my house. Like David approaching the giant of Gath in the valley of
Elah, I advanced upon the Goliath of Christmas trees. For a moment I was
afraid, but I knew that righteousness was on my side and I snatched the great
tree from its moorings and bore it out to the trash bin. Disregarding the
mystical signs that hung from its limbs, I broke it in half with my bare hands
and cast it down into the dark barrel, the Sheol of Christmas trees. Then all
the family – the mother, the wounded men,and even the babe – rejoiced." [SHORRIS, E., 1982, p. 40]
"A number of years ago," notes Maurice Friedman about common Jewish perspective on Christianity,
"one of my oldest friends, now a minister, told me of his hope of establishing
a community church which would attract many of the Jews in New York City
who no longer have any religious commitment. 'Will you have a cross at the
altar?' I asked.
'Of course,' he replied. 'It is a universal religious symbol.'
'That is where you are wrong,' I said. 'Even to the non-religious Jews
the cross is a symbol of anti-Semitism from which the Jew has had to suffer.'"
[FRIEDMAN, M., 1965, p. 211]”
6/7
7/7
Lets keep reading from the book “When Victims Rule”, chapter “3 - JEWS AND CHRISTIANITY”:
“ There are still excessive anti-Christian currents within much of Jewry today – even including among its educated leaders. Michael Wyschogrod, a Jewish philosophy professor, wrote in 1989:
"For many Jews, the cross is a source of contamination. From time to
time, I have helped organize Jewish-Christian meetings at Catholic
locations. There will almost always be some invited Jewish participants
who inquire whether there are any crucifixes in the meeting rooms or in
the room in which the participants sleep. If so, some participants will
refuse to attend or inquire whether the crucifixes can be covered over
or removed. What is going on here?" [WYSCHOGROD, p. 146]
Rabbi Daniel Lapin wrote an entire book in 1999 about Jewry's defamation of Christianity. As he notes,
"A scenario I have seen several times took place during a Rotary
luncheon I once attended. The invocation was given as it always is,
but on this occasion, unbeknownst to me, the presenter violated an
unwritten rule by invoking the name of Jesus. One of the prominent
members who is also a leader of the local Jewish community exploded
in a paroxysm of rage … Why do Jews think it acceptable to decree
how Christians may pray? Why do so many Jews feel that they must
take offense and react angrily at the invoking of the name of Jesus?"
[LAPIN, D., 1999, p. 300]
[See Chapter 20 for more discussion of traditional – and current – Jewish anti-Christian bigotry]”
>Note:
This is the whole Chapter 3 “Jews and Christianity” from the book “When Victims Rule”.
Link to chapter and whole book: https://archive.is/I5exz
7/7
Now that we took a look at judaism’s origins (and showed you that it IS a fact that judaism IS supremacist ideology) and we looked at the verifiable and FACTUAL jewish persecution and hatred of Christ and Christians, we will take a look at the alleged Khazar mass conversion to judaism, which some argue is real, some argue its fake. Me personally, I don’t buy it, but even if it did really happen, it does not make judaism any less of an ideological threat to the Western civilization, and if it is indeed real, it gives even more validity to the FACT that judaism NEEDS to be banned from the West
So, the alleged Khazar mass conversion to judaism happened in the 8th century, but as we've seen, judaism's history is full of persecution and hatred against Christ and Christians since the year 0 (when Christ was born), so that means that if any jew apologist tries to tell you that "today's jews are not the real jews, the real jews were not evil", then you know that jew apologist is either lying, or he has no idea what he is talking about, because even if the alleged Khazar theory is true, it only happened in the 8th century.
>to be continued