>>2699820
>1. Lack of knowledge on the inquisition.
How so?
>2. Lack of knowledge on communism (i am a russian secular - orthodox christian btw so i know what communism was).
Wow, I did not know that russians were born with that knowledge installed into their brains in the womb ;)
So you deny the jewish involvement in Bolshevism, is that your point? :)
>3. on the the "obama support of israel"
So you deny the fact that he sent Israel 38 billion US tax payer dollars? Here:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/14/world/middleeast/israel-benjamin-netanyahu-military-aid.html
And also:
https://www.jta.org/2017/01/17/news-opinion/united-states/obama-was-for-better-or-worse-the-face-of-liberal-zionism
https://www.haaretz.com/1.5113047 - "Barack Obama Backs Israel Remaining a Jewish State"
>4. On the f35 israeli deal
I never talked about it :)
>5. On jews being homogenous.
I never said they are, I did said that judaism IS a supremacist ideology according to the Torah, which is a fact :)
>6. On the early christian supremacism of protestants towards catholics (massacre of hugenots) and vice versa, and the crusades.
Tell me how is Christian supremacist, based on the content of the New Testament :)
Also, crusades had various reasons to happen, Usury from jewish loan sharks, muslim agression, and intra-Christian conflicts.
>7. the fact that almost all religions have the potential to become supremacist if you view "infidels" as low caste.
Islam and judaism ARE supremacist because of what is written the quran and the torah :)
>8. What is peer reviewed verifiable sources.
You still can't legitimize the excellent work that is the book "When Victims Rule", despite your promise to do so :)
>9. What is the difference between historians and phd in american literature
Tell me, in the works (that you dind't even read, lol) of E. Michael Jones, Henry Makow, Dr Tony Martin, are there any claims that you found to not be historically precise? Nothing but ad-hominems from you little yid boi :)
>10. What are clown op websites.
What makes one a clown op website. Tell me what content that I used as a source is not accurate :)
>11. How to critically check your "sources".
Lol, says the yid that does not even read the works of the people he tries to slander :)
>12. That facts tend to hurt your agenda ("nice projection :)")
Nice projection :)
>13. That patriots have color or are devided by the old social engineering
You don't have color? Wow, are you transparent? What do you think about Israel getting its borders open and the jewish people getting miscegenated into not existing? Is it "racist" in your opinion to be proud of your heritage and race? :)
>14. That protecting the occult global cabal by bashing jews.
Judaism (aka: jewish-supremacism) and jewish subversion are tools of the cabal, and exposing said tools is not "bashing jews" :)
>15. The desire to kill an entire population if a civil war "will ignite".
If a civil war ignites, jews, muslims and traitors are going to get targeted big time, that is a fact, deal with it :)
>16. The fact that your "book" is not a book, but is a clown op with no author, broken references, and out of context lies.
Prove it. The author is anonymous, and the content is sound, and sourced. Here:
https://archive.is/uv8Ss
https://archive.is/957wz
https://archive.is/dd6yE
https://archive.is/aP3sU
>16. The logical fallacy of "supporting trump" and at the same time calling his daughter and family in law who are religious to some extent, traitors.
Never called them traitors, only said that judaism IS a supremacist ideology, and once it gets banned in the West, ALL jews will have to choose between judaism or staying in the West :)
>Come on maggot, call me traitor, say "nice projection :)"
I call you a traitor because you are one, and I call out on your projection when I see it, yes :)
>Ad-hominems
Thanks for keeping admitting defeat.
Shalom kike traitor, stay mad :)