>What if the photo incorporated is the "victim"?
Yea, I think we all are at the point of seeing that. Likely victims of different rituals and possibly not all murder victims… although there is something errie about taking photos like these then having an artist paint them, and hanging them on your wall. it is a personal connection to the victims by the abusers. They get to see what they do as "Art" and not psychotic fuckery that it truly is
>Fear is the focus
>Not from the point of view from the victim but from the point of view of who executed
what the fuck?
>someone gave her photos to paint
That is what is suspected, however it is as she knows that the people in the photos are victims of an execution.
She could of meant "executed" as in the person who instilled fear in the heart of the person before taking the photo but to me, it sounds a bit more like she knows the fate of the people in the photos. Like she knows she is painting genuine fear and not imaginary fear.
Certainly possible, I could see an artist type wanting to "experience the fear firsthand"
She is probably supported as an artist by lack of moral quandry over the work she is commissioned to do. Do we know she is not a survivor of abuse herself? We know with Raniere that recruiting techniques for morally treacherous shit has advanced greatly with technology
I havent read up on the artist yet but her personal background is certainly in question now.
There is that fucking Pendant again