>>2672667 (pb)
>>2672718 (pb)
Post # 2672680 said "Link it anon."
It's legit, although IMDB doesn't mention it anywhere, an open WWW search found many references to both the book and the movie.
Here's one: <https://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/2736927/Road-rat.html>
I haven't yet found any documentation on what happened, why it wasn't released, etc.
667 anon, why do you suggest digging this? How is it related to Q's mission?
>>2672738 (pb)
(pic related) Just because someone wrote a book doesn't make it truth.
Ron Paul's lone dissenting vote stood out against the NWO gang's votes on many occasions in Congress. Was the author's examined time period cherry-picked to exclude Ron Paul's tenure in Congress?
>>2673158 (pb)
NOT notable without any sauce; you're just printing an accusation, without even naming names. Zero facts, just a speculation without ANYthing on which to dig.