>>2728418 (lb)
this anon is right baker, not sure how that got there
thanks!
still on standby, but I usually defer to regular bakers
She's pretty
what are those links to?
>Dont they describe elections more as a 'cloud' of probability?
yup
for simplification they're shown as paths around the nucleus
oh, if its already there then its all good
<look at me, I post like Q does
<muh attentionwhoring!
KEK nice anon
>Can an anon help a fellow Qfag out and explain to me how this fits into the plan?
roger stone said POTUS wouldn't run in 2020
its bullshit, just famewhoring because Mueller is looking at him