>>2731489
Bah, too early.. need covfefe.. meant to give you this.
Your shit isn't notable because:
Here, faggots. I posted this in a previous bread and here it is again for the newfags. Shills will not follow this; they know it will weed out their shit ;)
Here is a simple if/then set of questions that make discernment of notable posts easier:
Is the post relevant to MAGA/KAG/WW?
Is the post relevant to a Q drop?
If no, not notable; if yes, then:
Does the post quote from a source?
If no, not notable; if yes, then:
''Is the source of the source bullshit, or is it a legitimate validatable source?''
If bullshit, then not notable; If legitimate, then ''DINGDINGDING'' you have a notable post. The most important part of this process is checking that the source quoted by any article or report is actually valid.