>>2731540 (lb)
Largely speculative but an excellent analysis nonetheless. Only thing I disagree with is the MSM's predicted response…the precedent established by Manafort, Cohen raid, etc…will not matter one bit to them. When it happens to their people, they will scream and yell, propagate lies, and smear POTUS just like they did before. As Q stated, they will NEVER give up…it's the DS's only weapon left and they will continue using it until their operatives are dragged off the screen.
Maybe not, though….there are two developments that could potentially speed up the disclosure. First, if the MSM agents are dealt with and secondly, if there is a bombshell revelation that jars the public out of their slumber. Those two things happen, and things could move forward more quickly. But, more-less, I agree. We have to be patient. Sometimes it's hard to do, though, knowing what we know.
Sorry, but no. Just because an outlet disagrees with Trump does not make it fake news.
Is this really establishing a "legal" precedent? Or is it designed to expose the public to the already legal state of such a raid? What I mean is, is not already written into the law that attorney-client privilege does not shield an attorney from their own criminal acts…in this case the raid is raising awareness so that once it does happen it will be easier for the public to understand…
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/the-crime-fraud-exception-the-attorney-client-privilege.html