>>2735110

>If BO wants the change reverted

Why wouldn't he? He already weighed in once, after a long discussion where many anons weighed in. He said "the autists have spoken" about leaving "we no violenz" in as-is AFTER admitting he thought it was gay, but BEFORE the substitute language was suggested. Then he clearly chose that. It's been up for two weeks. If BO didn't agree with it, he'd have said so. Please remove it, baker.

And just so you guys know, the "don't condone force" was a compromise from the ORIGINAL alternative. Oldfags don't fuck around. We don't do PC, we don't use their language, we use ours. This isn't a democracy. Read our Welcome statement, it's clear. Arguments of oldfags re: maintaining chan culture are weighted more heavily than newfags arguing that we become more like MSM. Because we built this place.

>>2735295

I should also note a couple more things related to 2nd pic.

Re:

>>2734425 lb

1) It wasn't FMbaker who removed the statement, it was me, on request. I'm a baker that had been on graveyards a long time, so Anons knew me as being a /pol/-style baker, which is why night crew asked me to remove the statement.

2) Oldfags said this “we no violenz” argument had been had before, that the statement had been removed b4 by oldfag request, “but MomAnon baker kept putting it back in.” I don’t know who MomAnon is, just saying this has been an ongoing debate, until it was had out in detail with BO weighing in as the screen cap showed (remember, it’s BO’s board—the “O” stands for “owner”).

There’s a reason Q chose to migrate from 4chan to QR, and has chosen to stay, and that reason is BO & CM. BO’s style is hands-off (no rash changes) but also responsive—he’s not a despot. Those qualities keep otherwise chaotic orgs of independent spirits on a steady keel. Main thing is he’s true to the original culture of /pol/ that Q chose first. Because of that, for Q’s sake, I’d prefer we never make big changes to the dough—especially statements right up top—w/o getting BO’s feedback.

>>2734115 lb

Thanks for looking out, lads.

They can't outvote us if we out-argue them.

I have plenty of caps of the whole discussion if we need them. This is obviously a clown op, the "we're not violent, we promise!" campaign. It's an important issue to hold the line on.