Well said. Logic always wins.
I challenge you to prove these peoples' claines to be true.
Admit it ShareBlue scum, you got caught lying about them and doing so on purpose. As a busted liar I challenge you to prove them right. Prove their claims, go ahead.
He shouldn't be billed "historian" to give more credibility for his claims. It is the same as if a hobby physicist will bill himself as a physics phd.
The fact that these 3 men (cole, michael jones and makow) were billed "historians", exposes an agenda that uses lies to back it's non existent arguments.
It sounds much better to say "muh historian says", then to say "muh random guy who studied history by himself".
Historians put their professional name on the line as everything they write should be peer reviewed. These people on the other hand don't report to no one and can say what ever the hell they want.
>Damage control
"Nice projection :)"
Tell us more how talking about a subject makes you an expert who actually puts his professional name on the line whenever he talks. I like physics so i am an mit physics phd… Makes sense hahahaha
Now gtfo David Brock