>>2802771
So WaPo reported back here that there was a second source leaking to The Intercept:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2014/10/29/the-second-source-for-snowden-reporters-explained/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ec698eabd0c3
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newscientist.com/article/mg23130883-300-second-snowden-could-be-behind-sale-of-nsa-hacking-tools/amp/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wired.com/2015/10/a-second-snowden-leaks-a-mother-lode-of-drone-docs/amp