Agreed. Must be the timestamp (probably the :35-minute thing) that was relevant for some reason – clockfags will have to figure it out.
Rarely (or maybe never before) we got a direct reference to "the clock" – think this could be one. Thanks Q!
Agreed. Must be the timestamp (probably the :35-minute thing) that was relevant for some reason – clockfags will have to figure it out.
Rarely (or maybe never before) we got a direct reference to "the clock" – think this could be one. Thanks Q!