Anons,

Dear Chairman Nunes:

I write in response to your letter of February 7, 2018, in which you request that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court confirm whether "transcripts of relevant FISC hearings associated with" matters described in the letter exist and, if so, provide copies to the Committee.

As you know, any such transcripts would be classified.

http://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/Presiding%20Judge%20Rosemary%20M%20Collyer%20response%20to%20Chairman%20Nunes%20180215_0.pdf

>>2823884

( d) Testimony; Oath; Recording of Proceedings. A Judge may take testimony under

oath and receive other evidence. The testimony may be recorded electronically or as the

Judge may otherwise direct, consistent with the security measures referenced in Rule 3.

Rosemary's response?

"It may also be helpful for me to observe that, in a typical process of considering an application, we make no systematic record of

questions we ask or responses the government gives."

>>2823884

>>2824019

The considerations involve not only prerogatives of the Legislative Branch, but also interests of the Executive Branch

—Rosemary

Who must sign off on FISA warrants?

Who directs the signers?

>>2824094

Not just you anon

>>2823960 POTUS misspells FISC presiding Rosemary col[LIE]r

notable