>>2823733 (lb)
I don't mean this in a challenging way at all. I'd like to know the limitations of the FISC system. If even part of what you say is true, the system needs changing the next time Congress convenes.
Must be harder to climb stairs with that ankle bracelet on, eh?
Easy now. Go take your meds. Begging here.
>PREVIOUSLY MSM
WTF is a "previously MSM"?
Stop. Back away from the meme factory. You've done enough damage.
What you're saying makes sense but, seriously, the FISC process is clearly easily circumvented. It needs to be rethought to protect the U.S. from bad actors within the system. Sounds like the process assumes the applicants are legit out of the gate. That undermines the "innocent until proven guilty" mantra. And BTW, shouldn't tha mantra be "innocent ''unless'' proven guilty?
Ashamed I didn't point that out myself. You're right. Let's dig.