There is a gigantic email dump, and this board is literally incapable of really digging. Post after post of fake crap, fake fucking BO doing the idiotic charade of "confirming the baker handoff" as the bakers boop and beep, and the bots just churn away boops, fucked up memes, irrelevant bits of stuff, etc. etc. This board ought to be a furnace of burning through the emails. But it is far far from that. And that is because it is controlled by bots, with BO at the head.
Meanwhile, 4chan is held within strict anti-Q limits through its bots. Thus, division is kept absolutely locked in.
Think of how much division the fake division machine enforces among all the people that should be united. Forget about my hopeless fantasy, two years ago, that the Bernie people would come over and get undivided. That was never even close. But we are divided from Reddit, from boomers, from newfags. Every other possible identity, no matter what, is explicitly anti-Q… it's all-encompassing, the picture is clear. The machine is forcing everyone into tight little compartments, and profoundly robbing the effectiveness of each one. It's sick.
Humans need to be aware: 95% of the posts here are flat out fake. I have said it so many times. Don't know how to wake people up.
Among the five media groups to receive the documents prior to the WikiLeaks
release – America's New York Times, Britain's The Guardian, Germany's Der
Spiegel, France's Le Monde, and Spain's El Pais and – the Times has been
heavily referenced, with the issues it covered influencing the direction of
the overall coverage. Coverage by Agence France Presse has been extensive.
Broadcast coverage consisted of both brief "readers" as well as full reports
on the release of the State Department documents.
^Is that normal– major media getting the wikileaks before the wikileaks release proper?
No, exactly that: banker. Bankers have always been a source of problems.
It's not realistic for you to be bitter and angry about anons commenting on the fact that the board is controlled by bots, but not angry about the bots themselves. You can't make a fake character make sense, loserbot.
This is from a wikileaks email discussing the MSM coverage of an earlier WL release. Anyone know if there is usually a pre-release to MSM?
https://foia.state.gov/search/results.aspx
Quick hi
From: Tamera Luzzatto
B6 RELEASE IN PART B6
To: Hillary Clinton HDR22@clintonemail.com
CC: Tamera Luzzatto
Subject: Quick hi
Fun to see you with lots of admirers last night!
I did indeed get together with dragging him to the reception and press event celebrating the first responders health and
comp bill. Lots of memories, some great, some not! Maloney gave you a specific shout-out to much applause, and then in
honesty went on and on and on. and I went someplace else and caught up. To my relief and pleasure, he was a
delight. and we had a truly nice talk.
Also, thanks to John Podesta, we went to Shriver's funeral, a once in a lifetime experience and another chance to hear your
husband at his best. As you know, I got my DC start at ACTION, where I met John in '79 and when it ran VISTA and Peace
Corps. How lucky I was.
As you may have been told, I am assigned to nose around abt the potential of a push for the Law of the Sea. Had a good
check-in with Rich Verma and plan to come back the team to talk more. For just you "guys," Pew is considering making a
major commitment to help ratify, and if it does, it means incredible resources for an external coalition with what I have dubbed
the "weapons of mass construction."
My best as always xoxo, T
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Verma
International organizations, "think tanks", etc., always a bit fishy, IMO
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Asia_Group
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Huma Abedin
91612011 3:30:27 PM +00:00
H <HDR22@clinionemail.com>
Few things
B6
-
pdb is a large book and ready for you whenever u get in
-
found out this am it was [REDACTED] bday yesterday. I asked monica to pick up a cake this morning and hope we can do
something this afternoon or er
-
cristophe is in town and wants to see you tomorrow.
^Why do you have to redact someone for getting them a bday cake?
What could be redactable about cake?