Anonymous ID: 9a8fad Feb. 5, 2018, 10:22 p.m. No.283290   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3304 >>3334

We need a FOIA to get this. I suggest tweeting the obviously photoshopped pic at Tom Fitton/ Judicial Watch.

 

We are missing some pieces here.

 

Consistency issues:

1 - First paragraph of the text on her phone is the same as what she later posted on her website/twitter. This was her response to the the SOTU.

 

Why the full statement wasn't posted, or why that section is blurred out is a mystery.

 

2 - If you insert Q's claim of "Trump should be shot" in the blanked area it makes no sense. Context seems all wrong. Unless she is jokingly (or seriously) putting it in for an aid to read, thinking it would not surface. It does seem weird.

 

We are missing something vital here imo.

Thoughts on this?

Anonymous ID: 9a8fad Feb. 5, 2018, 10:55 p.m. No.283653   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3673 >>3699 >>3827

Build timeline.

 

>AS 187.

February 13th 2016

 

>HRC investigation pivot points.

LL tarmac meeting? June 27th 2016

 

>JC dismiss letter.

July 5th, 2016

 

>#2.

McCabe - ?

 

>PS.

Peter Strzok - ?

 

>WL comms.

 

WikiLeaks - ?

 

>Q