>>282871

Look at this.

AS talking on the phone with 2 witnesses to what was being said

>>283252

This is high res enough to show that the published photo had been editted from the original

>>283277

>www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVH9PYeNdB8&t=075s

My amateur lip reading hears it. I doubt the mike picks it up. Who is she? Who did she say it to?

>>283283

I agree. Check the Google images and see for yourself.

https:// www.google.ca/search?q=joyce+beatty

>>283363

Dems are the party of death. They attract morbid people. That's why young liberals are all into that vampire shit. They are all satanists

>>283403

Lets explain what this means. He is there taking photos. He sees that some people are using phones. Games are generally colorful so he thinks, is that a politician playing games in Congress? He has a telephoto lens. Then for artistic reasons and not to be accused of unfairly targettng one woman, he takes a group shot of a whole row of schiffless whores passing time with their phones while waiting for their next customers.

Seems to me that we have just caught a bunch of folks for whom VIRTUE SIGNALLING is far more important than serving the people who elected them.

Remember

AT HQME

GQLDMAN

Check the Wikileaks twitter for the solution…

>>280113

Have we missed something here? Is he right that the 4th time the camera showed the Dem phones in the audience, it caught a seditious message?

The 3 black ladies don't seem seditious just rather dumb