Anonymous ID: ef8ccd Feb. 5, 2018, 11:47 p.m. No.284145   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>284004

Among those who McCabe and other law enforcement officials have privately believed are potential witnesses are six of the highest-ranking officials of the agency: They include McCabe himself; Jim Rybicki, Comeyโ€™s chief of staff; James Baker, the general counsel of the FBI; David Bowdich, who as the FBIโ€™s associate director is the agencyโ€™s third-highest official; and Carl Ghattas, the head of the FBIโ€™s national security division; and a legal adviser to McCabe. McCabe was deputy director of the FBI until May, when he became acting director after President Trump fired Comey.

Anonymous ID: ef8ccd Feb. 5, 2018, 11:51 p.m. No.284177   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>284155

No one knows the future, you should be prepared because anything could happen, just don't go overboard because it probably won't, and even if it does you might not be able to use what you stored, and you might not even want to (in the case of something that will exceed your preparations).

The best idea is to take advantage of specials so you have food you will eat eventually, you save money and any short crisis you are ok.

Anonymous ID: ef8ccd Feb. 6, 2018, midnight No.284227   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4238 >>4244

>>284091

>>284208

>>284213

 

It happened, here is Carl Ghattis's speech.

 

Carl Ghattas

TO MY COLLEAGUE FROM THE FBI TO DISCUSS THE FBI'S IMPLEMENTATION OF SECTION 702. >MR. CHAIRMAN, RANKING MEMBER, MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE, GOOD MORNING. SECTION 702 IS AN EXTREMELY VALUABLE AND CRITICAL INVESTIGATIVE TOOL FOR THE FBI. EVERY FBI DIVISION CONDUCTING NATIONAL SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS DEFENDANT BENEFITS FROM INFORMATION COLLECTED BY 702. THAT'S WHETHER THE INFORMATION IS SHARED AS A TIP OR COLLECTED ON A TARGET RELEVANT TO AN FBI INVESTIGATION. LET ME SHARE WITH YOU AN EXAMPLE WHICH I EXERCISING MY DISCRETION AS AN ORIGINAL CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY HAVE DETERMINED CAN BE DECLASSIFIED TO HELP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BETTER UNDERSTAND THE VALUE OF SECTION 702 ESPECIALLY WITH RESPECT TO ITS FIGHT WITH ISIS. IN OCTOBER 2013, THE FBI STARTED INVESTIGATING SHAWN PARSON, A FOREIGN PERSON FROM TRINIDAD AND TO BAY TOBAGO. THIS WAS AFTER HE EXPRESSED ONLINE TO COMMIT AN ATTACK AGAINST WESTERN INTERESTS. WE USED A RANGE OF INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES INCLUDING 702. WE DID THIS IN AN EFFORT TO DETECT ANY ATTACK PLANNING THAT WAS UNDERWAY AND ASSESS THE EXTENT OF HIS INFLUENCE. IN NOVEMBER 2014 PARSON TRAVELED FROM TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO TO SYRIA AND BECAME INCREASINGLY VOCAL ONLINE. THE INFORMATION COLLECTED PURSUANT 702 REVEALED THAT PARSON WAS A TRUSTED MEMBER OF AN ISIS NETWORK. PARSON WAS A KEY PLAYER IN THIS NETWORK. THE NETWORK USED THE INTERNET AND SOCIAL MEDIA TO DISTRIBUTE PROLIFIC AMOUNTS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TERRORIST PROPAGANDA. THEY ENCOURAGED THEIR FOLLOWS TO CARRY OUT ATTACKS. THEY USED SOCIAL MEDIA DAILY AND DIRECTED COMMUNICATIONS WITH PEOPLE RAPID FIRE AND SPREAD THEIR MESSAGE ENCOURAGING PEEL TO ATTACK. โ€“ PEOPLE TO ATTACK. PARSON WAS A NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER AND HE EVEN APPEARED IN AN ISIS RECRUITING VIDEO. THIS NETWORK IDENTIFIED AMERICAN MILITARY MEN AND WOMEN AND POSTED THEIR NAMES AND ADDRESSES ONLINE. THEY INSTRUCTED THEIR ONLINE FOLLOWERS TO KILL THEM IN THEIR OWN LANDS, BEHEAD THEM IN THEIR OWN HOMES, STAB THEM TO DEATH AS THEY WALK THEIR STREETS THINKING THEY ARE SAFE, UNQUOTE. PARSON ENCOURAGED HIS FOLLOWERS TO ATTACK U.S. POLICE OFFICERS, U.S. MILITARY BASES LOCATED IN COLORADO, OHIO AND SOFT TARGETS IN NEW YORK CITY, CHICAGO AND LOS ANGELES. INFORMATION OBTAINED THROUGH SECTION 702 COVERAGE NOT ONLY REVEALED PARSON'S PERSISTENT TERRORIST PROPAGANDA BUT IT WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN IDENTIFYING ADDITIONAL MEMBERS OF PARSON'S NETWORK. THE FBI SHARED THIS INFORMATION WITH THE REST OF THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY. WE ALSO SHARED IT WITH TRUSTS INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS. SHARING PARSON'S CONTACTS WITH OUR INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS WAS CRITICAL AS IT LED TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF ADDITIONAL ISIS FACILITATORS AND SUPPORTERS IN THOSE COUNTRIES AND IT POTENTIALLY PREVENTED ATTACKS IN THOSE COUNTRIES AS WELL. PARSON WAS EVENTUALLY KILLED IN SYRIA IN SEPTEMBER 2015. LET ME TALK NEXT ABOUT THE FBI'S PRACTICE IN QUERYING 702 COLLECTION. WITH REGARD TO THAT COLLECTION, IT'S IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER THAT THE FBI RECEIVES A SMALL FRACTION OF THE TOTAL COLLECTION THAT NSA ACQUIRES UNDER THIS PROGRAM. IN FACT, THE FBI ONLY RECEIVES A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF NSA'S DOWNSTREAM COLLECTION AND NONE OF THE UMP TREATMENT COLLECTION. THE REASON IS THAT โ€“ IS RELEVANT TO A PENDING, FULL INVESTIGATION. THE FBI CANNOT RECEIVE SECTION 702 DURING A PRELIMINARY INQUERY OR AN ASSESSMENT. THOSE QUERIES ARE RUN AGAINST A SMALL FRACTION OF THE TOTAL 702 COLLECTION ACQUIRED BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. WHEN THE FBI RUNS A U.S. PERSON IDENTIFYIER THROUGH OUR DATABASE,S THAT RUN THROUGH 702 COLLECTION THAT'S OBTAINED DURING FBI FULL INVESTIGATIONS AND NOT THE TOTAL COLLECTION MAINTAINED BY THE NSA. THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY AND IF THE FBI UTILIZE 702 โ€“ AFTER THOSE COMMUNICATIONS ARE COLLECTED THEY'RE RETAINED IN OUR DATABASE AND ARE AVAILABLE FOR AUTHORIZED FBI AGENTS AND ANALYSTS TO SUBSEQUENTLY QUERY. LATER, WHEN A TIP OR LEAD SUGGESTS THAT A U.S. PERSON LOCATED HERE MAY POSE A THREAT, ONE OF THE BEST INVESTIGATIVE STEPS IS TO SEARCH EXISTING COLLECTION TO DETERMINE WHAT KIND OF THREAT WE'RE DEALING WITH. THIS IS WHAT HELPS US CONNECT THE DOTS. FINALLY I'M AWARE THAT SOME CRITICS OF THE 702 COLLECTION PROGRAM HAVE SUGGESTED THAT THE FBI SHOULD OBTAIN A WARRANT BEFORE QUERYING A U.S. PERSON IDENTIFIER AGAINST OUR 702 COLLECTION. IMPOSING A WARRANT WOULD SEVERELY HAMPER OUR OPERATIONS BY CREATING A BARRIER BETWEEN THE FBI โ€“ I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR SUBJECT DURING THE SOURCE OF THIS HEARING. THANK YOU AT THIS POINT FOR ALLOWING ME TO MAKE THESE REMARKS. NOW

Anonymous ID: ef8ccd Feb. 6, 2018, 12:02 a.m. No.284244   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4247 >>4317

>>284227

Caps not mine, put it through a sentence case converterโ€ฆ

 

Carl ghattas

To my colleague from the fbi to discuss the fbi's implementation of section 702. >mr. Chairman, ranking member, members of the committee, good morning. Section 702 is an extremely valuable and critical investigative tool for the fbi. Every fbi division conducting national security investigations defendant benefits from information collected by 702. That's whether the information is shared as a tip or collected on a target relevant to an fbi investigation. Let me share with you an example which I exercising my discretion as an original classification authority have determined can be declassified to help the american people better understand the value of section 702 especially with respect to its fight with isis. In october 2013, the fbi started investigating shawn parson, a foreign person from trinidad and to bay tobago. This was after he expressed online to commit an attack against western interests. We used a range of investigative tools and techniques including 702. We did this in an effort to detect any attack planning that was underway and assess the extent of his influence. In november 2014 parson traveled from trinidad and tobago to syria and became increasingly vocal online. The information collected pursuant 702 revealed that parson was a trusted member of an isis network. Parson was a key player in this network. The network used the internet and social media to distribute prolific amounts of english language terrorist propaganda. They encouraged their follows to carry out attacks. They used social media daily and directed communications with people rapid fire and spread their message encouraging peel to attack. โ€“ people to attack. Parson was a native english speaker and he even appeared in an isis recruiting video. This network identified american military men and women and posted their names and addresses online. They instructed their online followers to kill them in their own lands, behead them in their own homes, stab them to death as they walk their streets thinking they are safe, unquote. Parson encouraged his followers to attack u.S. Police officers, u.S. Military bases located in colorado, ohio and soft targets in new york city, chicago and los angeles. Information obtained through section 702 coverage not only revealed parson's persistent terrorist propaganda but it was instrumental in identifying additional members of parson's network. The fbi shared this information with the rest of the intelligence community. We also shared it with trusts international partners. Sharing parson's contacts with our international partners was critical as it led to the identification of additional isis facilitators and supporters in those countries and it potentially prevented attacks in those countries as well. Parson was eventually killed in syria in september 2015. Let me talk next about the fbi's practice in querying 702 collection. With regard to that collection, it's important to remember that the fbi receives a small fraction of the total collection that nsa acquires under this program. In fact, the fbi only receives a small percentage of nsa's downstream collection and none of the ump treatment collection. The reason is that โ€“ is relevant to a pending, full investigation. The fbi cannot receive section 702 during a preliminary inquery or an assessment. Those queries are run against a small fraction of the total 702 collection acquired by the u.S. Government. When the fbi runs a u.S. Person identifyier through our database,s that run through 702 collection that's obtained during fbi full investigations and not the total collection maintained by the nsa. The intelligence community and if the fbi utilize 702 โ€“ after those communications are collected they're retained in our database and are available for authorized fbi agents and analysts to subsequently query. Later, when a tip or lead suggests that a u.S. Person located here may pose a threat, one of the best investigative steps is to search existing collection to determine what kind of threat we're dealing with. This is what helps us connect the dots. Finally I'm aware that some critics of the 702 collection program have suggested that the fbi should obtain a warrant before querying a u.S. Person identifier against our 702 collection. Imposing a warrant would severely hamper our operations by creating a barrier between the FBI โ€“ I'm happy to answer any further questions you may have about this particular subject during the source of this hearing. Thank you at this point for allowing me to make these remarks. Now

Anonymous ID: ef8ccd Feb. 6, 2018, 12:16 a.m. No.284317   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>284244

>>284091

 

Not that terribly interesting, besides some stuff about bad ISISโ€ฆ The only mildly interesting thing is this.

 

The intelligence community and if the FBI utilize 702 โ€“ after those communications are collected they're retained in our database and are available for authorized FBI agents and analysts to subsequently query. Later, when a tip or lead suggests that a U.S. Person located here may pose a threat, one of the best investigative steps is to search existing collection to determine what kind of threat we're dealing with. This is what helps us connect the dots. Finally I'm aware that some critics of the 702 collection program have suggested that the FBI should obtain a warrant before querying a U.S. Person identifier against our 702 collection. Imposing a warrant would severely hamper our operations by creating a barrier between the FBI

Anonymous ID: ef8ccd Feb. 6, 2018, 1:39 a.m. No.284541   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>284497

They had to finally give up the suicide claim on that one.

Really though, what Dobbs the Clinton murder in as murders is precisely that the cops are happy to say that clear murders that could not possibly be suicide are suicide.

 

We all have people in our circle that die, but police don't just declare obvious murders as suicides, that is the part that is so blatant, that is the message that they are above the law and can make an obvious murder a suicide because they own law enforcement!

Anonymous ID: ef8ccd Feb. 6, 2018, 2:13 a.m. No.284632   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4642

>>284601

The problem with Islam is not if Allah means the same thing as God (of course it could without meaning there is any agreement about the qualities/identities of each God).

 

And truth be told,it's not even what their book says, I mean Christians aren't doing things based on what the bible says, we are picking and choosing the more modern and nice bits, the convenient bits and leaving the rest behind.

 

No, the problem is that there is a lot of terribly regressive violent extremest BS from the Muslims, and that makes a lot of them fit for nothing but dying, or at least a major movement to undo the current trends of evil.

Anonymous ID: ef8ccd Feb. 6, 2018, 2:17 a.m. No.284642   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>284632

Oh, I'm not Christian, but I'm non not a Christian either. I kinda implied i am, well i was, but to be honest I am more interested in truth than regurgitating a book that was written too long ago to be terribly relivant.

 

A lot of agnostic and atheistic people in the west still have, (weather they want to admit it or not) inherited a new testament Jesus-y do unto others, love people, try and be truthful, give to the needyโ€ฆ Kind of ethic from our society because it is based on Christian ideals, even if it is hypocritical at the top.

Anonymous ID: ef8ccd Feb. 6, 2018, 2:20 a.m. No.284654   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>284622

it's not about what the books say.

It is depending on how many extremest regressive assholes there are.

 

Islam is not specifically the problem, the problem is that a LOT of Arabs have become extremeist assholes, it has not helped that the US has been bombing them into the stone-age which tends to make for more backwards assholes as people are angry and don't have a life.