GA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfzfd0kw57Q
"Don't get upset at the dirty stuff you find
That's why you are cleaning house"
-
Deborah L. Johnson 10/15/2017
The stuff you find.
https://web.archive.org/web/20100716130427/https://blogs.wsj.com/privateequity/2010/07/12/rizvi-traverse-isnt-as-iconic-as-hef-but-it-has-entertainment-experience/
Hef.
"Rizvi Traverse Management.
Happy hunting."
"Founded in 2004 by Suhail Rizvi and John A. Giampetroni, Rizvi Traverse is headquartered in Birmingham, Mich. with offices in Los Angeles and New York. The firm has a private equity team of at least a dozen investment professionals."
"POTUS will not be addressing nation on any of these issues as people begin to be indicted and must remain neutral for pure optical reasons."
"Trump has filled top posts within his administration with military generals, including his chief of staff, retired General John Kelly, and national security adviser, Lieutenant General H.R. McMaster. McMaster, who normally dresses in civilian clothes at the White House, wore his uniform for the meeting."
"Don’t fool yourself into thinking Obama, Soros, Roth’s, Clinton’s etc have more power present day than POTUS.
Operation Mockingbird
Patriots are in control. Sit back and enjoy the show."
"Priority to clean out the bad actors to unite people behind the America First agenda."
"United States Supreme Court
CIA v. SIMS, (1985)
No. 83-1075
Argued: December 4, 1984 Decided: April 16, 1985
[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 83-1249, Sims et al. v. Central Intelligence Agency et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
Between 1953 and 1966, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) financed a research project, code-named MKULTRA, that was established to counter Soviet and Chinese advances in brainwashing and interrogation techniques. Subprojects were contracted out to various universities, research foundations, and similar institutions. In 1977, respondents in No. 83-1075 (hereafter respondents) filed a request with the CIA under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), seeking, inter alia, the names of the institutions and individuals who had performed the research under MKULTRA. Citing Exemption 3 of the FOIA - which provides that an agency need not disclose "matters that are . . . specifically exempted from disclosure by statute . . . provided that such statute . . . refers to particular types of matters to be withheld" - the CIA declined to disclose the requested information. The CIA invoked, as the exempting statute referred to in Exemption 3, 102(d)(3) of the National Security Act of 1947, which states that "the Director of Central Intelligence shall be responsible for protecting intelligence sources and methods from unauthorized disclosure." Respondents then filed suit under the FOIA in Federal District Court. Applying, as directed by the Court of Appeals on an earlier appeal, a definition of "intelligence sources" as meaning only those sources to which the CIA had to guarantee confidentiality in order to obtain the information, the District Court held that the identities of researchers who had received express guarantees of confidentiality need not be disclosed, and also exempted from disclosure other researchers on the ground that their work for the CIA, apart from MKULTRA, required that their identities remain secret. The court further held that there was no need to disclose the institutional affiliations of the individual researchers whose identities were exempt from disclosure. The Court of Appeals affirmed this latter holding, but reversed the District Court's ruling with respect to which individual researchers satisfied "the need-for-confidentiality" aspect of its formulation [471 U.S. 159, 160] of exempt "intelligence sources." The Court of Appeals held that it was error automatically to exempt from disclosure those researchers to whom confidentiality had been promised, and that an individual qualifies as an "intelligence source" exempt from disclosure under the FOIA only when the CIA offers sufficient proof that it needs to protect its efforts in confidentiality in order to obtain the type of information provided by the researcher."