but they aren't protecting a whistle-blower or someone exposing illegality, they are covering for someone who (ostensibly, if real) is committing illegality; they do not have the legal right to protect that person as a "source"
Anaheim - where every window is barred!
Fitting place, really.
We're being DDOS'd again I take it? super laggy…
I GUESS (((THEY))) GOT SOME KINDA COMPUTER BACK UP ONLINE FOR WHEN Q POSTS…
dey r skeered!!!
LEO should look into that particular venue & people there!!! Pls report it to the US Secret Service, for that little boy's sake
well done :)
SO - what can we learn from this case?
Beckett Law - Religious Liberty for All
https://www.becketlaw.org/case/newdow-v-rio-linda-union-school-district/
Newdow v Rio Linda Union School District
Decision date: 3-11-10
Decision: won
Deciding Court: US Court of Appeals for Ninth Circuit
What is Q pointing us to find?
-9th circuit = notorious flaming leftist judicial activists
-case was won
-implications?
-is it being appealed from that decision?
it's on zerohedge.com for free, or you could always get the link for nyt and put it into unvis.it (strips it and gives the site no ad clicks!) nd read it that way
For some reason there's a very strange contingent here who really, really likes & pushes that and promotes it as if it is legitimate and common sense. Prob evang's