>>2947428

>>2947499

>>2947599

>>2947616

>>2947621

>>2947632

I am always going to be skeptical of anyone who lead the rah-rah cheers for war based on 9/11 lies, and here's why:

1) If you believe the towers came down the way they did because a couple of commercial jets ran into them then you have no understanding of engineering, structural dynamics, or basic physics and your opinion means jack-shit to me;

OR

2) You are aware that controlled demolition was involved and lead the cheers anyway.

So yeah, still skeptical here.

>>2947705

>>2947825

>>2947890

I wouldn't go so far as to call Hannity a traitor…ignorant and uneducated (at the time), perhaps, but not a traitor.

He's currently helping the cause, and I'm content to wait and see what happens when (if?) 9/11 truth is confirmed publicly.