Thank you Baker.
>>2960185 (Last bread)
>Jack, don't you have a baby to attend to?
Keep blindly following the cryptic cock teasing empty promises of an anonymous 8chan poster who gives only blue balls and who Trump has disowned.
I really don't give a fuck what you do.
>An entire airliner of people crashes into the World Trade Center, and Bush just sits there?
>Wouldn't SS take him to a safe location?
Damn good questions, anon.
Israel is our ally.
The ICC is an unelected, unaccountable, unconstitutional lynch mob .. meant only to further global marxism by convicting US citizens to keep the rest of us in line.
We should defund The Hague immediately.
Let the cunts jerk themselves off.
Nonsense.
Trump didn't invent Q.
As such, it's not Trump's obligation to prove disprove Q, or any other larping/psyop idiot who posts cryptic bullshit on an 8chan board.
Q: "I'm a Trump insider … Trump needs to prove me wrong." That is a 7 year old child's game.
If someone claims to be closely tied to you and claims to be working and speaking for you, is it your obligation to prove otherwise?
Once Trump starts trying to disprove a nonexistant internet troll, Trump opens the floodgates to every bored 17 year old who wants to pester him and his supporters.
Trump has better things to do than to bother with muh Q.
This psyop has destroyed your ability to think rationally.
Sarah Sanders is Trump's press sec and spokeswoman.
Sarah has been asked "the ultimate question", and she emphatically distanced Trump from Q.
She even lumped Q in with other fringe groups.
So, you have to suspend trust in Trump, who is out in the public and accountable for his words/actions, in order to believe that Q is tied to Trump in any way.
I trust Trump.
I don't know who Q is and I certainly don't dismiss Trump's official spokeswoman in order to believe in some anonymous poster of cryptic bullshit on an 8chan board.
But, you go ahead and believe Q over Trump if you want to.
Doesn't matter to me.
I'm just pointing out significant inconsistencies of this Q that should be considered.
>Doesn't have to be Trump, could be literally anyone in his admin.
So, you want someone to speak for Trump?
Someone already has - Sarah Sanders.
Sarah emphatically distanced Trump form Q, lumping Q in with other extreme groups.
Afterward, Q very quickly dropped his push for someone to "ask the ultimate question."
Q was denied by Trump's press sec so he ran from his own bullshit and changed the subject.
>Uh, yes, Trump has disavowed many people publically and obviously loves calling out the fake news media.
Yes, the people Trump calls out are real people, out in public and accountable.
Q is an anonymous poster on 8chan … namelsess, faceless, and unaccountable for his words/actions.
Are you too stupid to understand the problem with Trump responding to anonymous internet posters?