>>2960651
Doesn't have to be Trump, could be literally anyone in his admin.
> If someone claims to be closely tied to you and claims to be working and speaking for you, is it your obligation to prove otherwise?
Uh, yes, Trump has disavowed many people publically and obviously loves calling out the fake news media. How fucking stupid is this question, seriously.
Once Trump starts trying to disprove a nonexistant internet troll, Trump opens the floodgates to every bored 17 year old who wants to pester him and his supporters.
Like I said, Trump already disproves nonexistant claims and trolls through his Twitter. Funny how you can equivocate Q's hundreds of thousands of followers and millions of posts here to a 17 year old. Wonder why you can't come up with an answer for why he'd allow hundreds of thousands of his followers to be duped on this scale, being fed this amount of information?
It's always the same with shills too, you counter their claims, they have literally nothing for yours, and then they proceed with more bullshit. It'd be funny if it weren't so incredibly sad. No logic, no reason, no rhyme, no truth behind what you say expose you immediately.